CC Adi 7.45 - Revision history

Yadasampati: Bot: set display title

2026-06-03T19:47:59Z

Bot: set display title

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, 3 June 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{DISPLAYTITLE:CC Adi 7.45 (1996)}}
	[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Adi-lila Chapter 07\|C045]]		[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Adi-lila Chapter 07\|C045]]
	<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta\|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Adi\|Ādi-līlā]] - [[CC Adi 7\|Chapter 7: Lord Caitanya in Five Features]]'''</div>		<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta\|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Adi\|Ādi-līlā]] - [[CC Adi 7\|Chapter 7: Lord Caitanya in Five Features]]'''</div>

Elad: Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

2024-02-19T19:16:46Z

Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, 19 February 2024
Line 17:		Line 17:

	<div class="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	''kāśīte''~~—in~~ Vārāṇasī; ''lekhaka''~~—writer~~; ''śūdra''~~—born~~ of a ''śūdra'' family; ''śrī-candraśekhara''~~—Candraśekhara~~; ''tāṅra ghare''~~—in~~ his house; ''rahilā''~~—remained~~; ''prabhu''~~—the~~ Lord; ''svatantra''~~—independent~~; ''īśvara''~~—the~~ supreme controller.		''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kāśīte&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kāśīte]'' — in Vārāṇasī; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=lekhaka&tab=syno_o&ds=1 lekhaka]'' — writer; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=śūdra&tab=syno_o&ds=1 śūdra]'' — born of a ''śūdra'' family; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=śrī&tab=syno_o&ds=1 śrī]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=candraśekhara&tab=syno_o&ds=1 candraśekhara]'' — Candraśekhara; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tāṅra&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tāṅra] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ghare&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ghare]'' — in his house; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=rahilā&tab=syno_o&ds=1 rahilā]'' — remained; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=prabhu&tab=syno_o&ds=1 prabhu]'' — the Lord; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=svatantra&tab=syno_o&ds=1 svatantra]'' — independent; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=īśvara&tab=syno_o&ds=1 īśvara]'' — the supreme controller.
	</div>		</div>

Soham at 17:20, 6 July 2021

2021-07-06T17:20:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, 6 July 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~CC_Header~~\|{{~~PAGENAME}}~~}}		[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Adi-lila Chapter 07\|C045]]
			<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta\|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Adi\|Ādi-līlā]] - [[CC Adi 7\|Chapter 7: Lord Caitanya in Five Features]]'''</div>
			<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=CC Adi 7.44\|Ādi-līlā 7.44]] '''[[CC Adi 7.44\|Ādi-līlā 7.44]] - [[CC Adi 7.46\|Ādi-līlā 7.46]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=CC Adi 7.46\|Ādi-līlā 7.46]]</div>
			{{CompareVersions\|CC\|Adi 7.45\|CC 1975\|CC 1996}}
			{{RandomImage}}


	==== TEXT 45 ====		==== TEXT 45 ====

	<div id="~~text~~">		<div class="verse">
	kāśīte lekhaka śūdra-śrīcandraśekhara~~<br>~~		:kāśīte lekhaka śūdra-śrīcandraśekhara
	tāṅra ghare rahilā prabhu svatantra īśvara~~<br>~~		:tāṅra ghare rahilā prabhu svatantra īśvara
	</div>		</div>

Line 12:		Line 16:
	==== SYNONYMS ====		==== SYNONYMS ====

	<div id="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	~~kāśīte—in~~ Vārāṇasī; ~~lekhaka—writer~~; ~~śūdra—born~~ of a śūdra family; śrī-~~candraśekhara—Candraśekhara~~; tāṅra ~~ghare—in~~ his house; ~~rahilā—remained~~; ~~prabhu—the~~ Lord; ~~svatantra—independent~~; ~~īśvara—the~~ supreme controller.		''kāśīte''—in Vārāṇasī; ''lekhaka''—writer; ''śūdra''—born of a ''śūdra'' family; ''śrī-candraśekhara''—Candraśekhara; ''tāṅra ghare''—in his house; ''rahilā''—remained; ''prabhu''—the Lord; ''svatantra''—independent; ''īśvara''—the supreme controller.
	</div>		</div>

Line 19:		Line 23:
	==== TRANSLATION ====		==== TRANSLATION ====

	<div id="translation">		<div class="translation">
	This time Lord Caitanya stayed at the house of Candraśekhara, although he was regarded as a śūdra or kāyastha, for the Lord, as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is completely independent.		This time Lord Caitanya stayed at the house of Candraśekhara, although he was regarded as a śūdra or kāyastha, for the Lord, as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is completely independent.
	</div>		</div>
Line 26:		Line 30:
	==== PURPORT ====		==== PURPORT ====

	<div id="purport">		<div class="purport">
	Lord Caitanya stayed at the house of Candraśekhara, a clerk, although a sannyāsī is not supposed to reside in a śūdra’s house. Five hundred years ago, especially in Bengal, it was the system that persons who were born in the families of brāhmaṇas were accepted as brāhmaṇas, and all those who took birth in other families—even the higher castes, namely, the kṣatriyas and ~~vaiśyas—were~~ considered śūdras, non-brāhmaṇas. Therefore although Śrī Candraśekhara was a clerk from a kāyastha family in upper India, he was considered a śūdra. Similarly, vaiśyas, especially those of the suvarṇa-vaṇik community, were accepted as śūdras in Bengal, and even the vaidyas, who were generally physicians, were also considered śūdras. Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu, however, did not accept this artificial principle, which was introduced in society by self-interested men, and later the kāyasthas, vaidyas and vaṇiks all began to accept the sacred thread, despite objections from the so-called brāhmaṇas.		Lord Caitanya stayed at the house of Candraśekhara, a clerk, although a ''sannyāsī'' is not supposed to reside in a ''śūdra’s'' house. Five hundred years ago, especially in Bengal, it was the system that persons who were born in the families of ''brāhmaṇas'' were accepted as ''brāhmaṇas'', and all those who took birth in other families—even the higher castes, namely, the ''kṣatriyas'' and ''vaiśyas''—were considered ''śūdras'', non-''brāhmaṇas''. Therefore although Śrī Candraśekhara was a clerk from a ''kāyastha'' family in upper India, he was considered a ''śūdra''. Similarly, ''vaiśyas'', especially those of the ''suvarṇa-vaṇik'' community, were accepted as ''śūdras'' in Bengal, and even the ''vaidyas'', who were generally physicians, were also considered ''śūdras''. Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu, however, did not accept this artificial principle, which was introduced in society by self-interested men, and later the ''kāyasthas'', ''vaidyas'' and ''vaṇiks'' all began to accept the sacred thread, despite objections from the so-called ''brāhmaṇas''.

	Before the time of Caitanya Mahāprabhu, the suvarṇa-vaṇik class was condemned by Ballāl Sena, who was then the King of Bengal, due to a personal grudge. In Bengal the suvarṇa-vaṇik class are always very rich, for they are bankers and dealers in gold and silver. Therefore, Ballāl Sena used to borrow money from a suvarṇa-vaṇik banker. Ballāl Sena’s bankruptcy later obliged the suvarṇa-vaṇik banker to stop advancing money to him, and thus Ballāl Sena became angry and condemned the entire suvarṇa-vaṇik society as belonging to the śūdra community. He tried to induce the brāhmaṇas not to accept the suvarṇa-vaṇiks as followers of the instructions of the Vedas under the brahminical directions, but although some brāhmaṇas approved of Ballāl Sena’s actions, others did not. Thus the brāhmaṇas also became divided amongst themselves, and those who supported the suvarṇa-vaṇik class were rejected from the brāhmaṇa community. At the present day the same biases are still being followed.		Before the time of Caitanya Mahāprabhu, the ''suvarṇa-vaṇik'' class was condemned by Ballāl Sena, who was then the King of Bengal, due to a personal grudge. In Bengal the ''suvarṇa-vaṇik'' class are always very rich, for they are bankers and dealers in gold and silver. Therefore, Ballāl Sena used to borrow money from a ''suvarṇa-vaṇik'' banker. Ballāl Sena’s bankruptcy later obliged the ''suvarṇa-vaṇik'' banker to stop advancing money to him, and thus Ballāl Sena became angry and condemned the entire ''suvarṇa-vaṇik'' society as belonging to the ''śūdra'' community. He tried to induce the ''brāhmaṇas'' not to accept the ''suvarṇa-vaṇiks'' as followers of the instructions of the ''Vedas'' under the brahminical directions, but although some ''brāhmaṇas'' approved of Ballāl Sena’s actions, others did not. Thus the ''brāhmaṇas'' also became divided amongst themselves, and those who supported the ''suvarṇa-vaṇik'' class were rejected from the ''brāhmaṇa'' community. At the present day the same biases are still being followed.

	There are many Vaiṣṇava families in Bengal whose members, although not actually born brāhmaṇas, act as ācāryas by initiating disciples and offering the sacred thread as enjoined in the Vaiṣṇava tantras. For example, in the families of Ṭhākura Raghunandana Ācārya, Ṭhākura Kṛṣṇadāsa, Navanī Hoḍa and Rasikānanda-deva (a disciple of Śyāmānanda Prabhu), the sacred thread ceremony is performed, as it is for the caste Gosvāmīs, and this system has continued for the past three to four hundred years. Accepting disciples born in brāhmaṇa families, they are bona fide spiritual masters who have the facility to worship the śālagrāma-śilā, which is worshiped with the Deity. As of this writing, śālagrāma-śilā worship has not yet been introduced in our Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement, but soon it will be introduced in all our temples as an essential function of arcana-mārga (Deity worship).		There are many Vaiṣṇava families in Bengal whose members, although not actually born ''brāhmaṇas'', act as ''ācāryas'' by initiating disciples and offering the sacred thread as enjoined in the Vaiṣṇava ''tantras''. For example, in the families of Ṭhākura Raghunandana Ācārya, Ṭhākura Kṛṣṇadāsa, Navanī Hoḍa and Rasikānanda-deva (a disciple of Śyāmānanda Prabhu), the sacred thread ceremony is performed, as it is for the caste Gosvāmīs, and this system has continued for the past three to four hundred years. Accepting disciples born in ''brāhmaṇa'' families, they are bona fide spiritual masters who have the facility to worship the ''śālagrāma-śilā'', which is worshiped with the Deity. As of this writing, ''śālagrāma-śilā'' worship has not yet been introduced in our Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement, but soon it will be introduced in all our temples as an essential function of ''arcana-mārga'' (Deity worship).
	</div>		</div>
	__NOTOC__~~{{CC_Footer\|{{PAGENAME}}}}~~

			<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=CC Adi 7.44\|Ādi-līlā 7.44]] '''[[CC Adi 7.44\|Ādi-līlā 7.44]] - [[CC Adi 7.46\|Ādi-līlā 7.46]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=CC Adi 7.46\|Ādi-līlā 7.46]]</div>
			__NOTOC__
			__NOEDITSECTION__

Acyuta: 1 revision(s)

2008-03-18T23:11:34Z

1 revision(s)

New page

{{CC_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}

==== TEXT 45 ====

<div id="text">
kāśīte lekhaka śūdra-śrīcandraśekhara<br>
tāṅra ghare rahilā prabhu svatantra īśvara<br>
</div>

==== SYNONYMS ====

<div id="synonyms">
kāśīte—in Vārāṇasī; lekhaka—writer; śūdra—born of a śūdra family; śrī-candraśekhara—Candraśekhara; tāṅra ghare—in his house; rahilā—remained; prabhu—the Lord; svatantra—independent; īśvara—the supreme controller.
</div>

==== TRANSLATION ====

<div id="translation">
This time Lord Caitanya stayed at the house of Candraśekhara, although he was regarded as a śūdra or kāyastha, for the Lord, as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is completely independent.
</div>

==== PURPORT ====

<div id="purport">
Lord Caitanya stayed at the house of Candraśekhara, a clerk, although a sannyāsī is not supposed to reside in a śūdra’s house. Five hundred years ago, especially in Bengal, it was the system that persons who were born in the families of brāhmaṇas were accepted as brāhmaṇas, and all those who took birth in other families—even the higher castes, namely, the kṣatriyas and vaiśyas—were considered śūdras, non-brāhmaṇas. Therefore although Śrī Candraśekhara was a clerk from a kāyastha family in upper India, he was considered a śūdra. Similarly, vaiśyas, especially those of the suvarṇa-vaṇik community, were accepted as śūdras in Bengal, and even the vaidyas, who were generally physicians, were also considered śūdras. Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu, however, did not accept this artificial principle, which was introduced in society by self-interested men, and later the kāyasthas, vaidyas and vaṇiks all began to accept the sacred thread, despite objections from the so-called brāhmaṇas.

Before the time of Caitanya Mahāprabhu, the suvarṇa-vaṇik class was condemned by Ballāl Sena, who was then the King of Bengal, due to a personal grudge. In Bengal the suvarṇa-vaṇik class are always very rich, for they are bankers and dealers in gold and silver. Therefore, Ballāl Sena used to borrow money from a suvarṇa-vaṇik banker. Ballāl Sena’s bankruptcy later obliged the suvarṇa-vaṇik banker to stop advancing money to him, and thus Ballāl Sena became angry and condemned the entire suvarṇa-vaṇik society as belonging to the śūdra community. He tried to induce the brāhmaṇas not to accept the suvarṇa-vaṇiks as followers of the instructions of the Vedas under the brahminical directions, but although some brāhmaṇas approved of Ballāl Sena’s actions, others did not. Thus the brāhmaṇas also became divided amongst themselves, and those who supported the suvarṇa-vaṇik class were rejected from the brāhmaṇa community. At the present day the same biases are still being followed.

There are many Vaiṣṇava families in Bengal whose members, although not actually born brāhmaṇas, act as ācāryas by initiating disciples and offering the sacred thread as enjoined in the Vaiṣṇava tantras. For example, in the families of Ṭhākura Raghunandana Ācārya, Ṭhākura Kṛṣṇadāsa, Navanī Hoḍa and Rasikānanda-deva (a disciple of Śyāmānanda Prabhu), the sacred thread ceremony is performed, as it is for the caste Gosvāmīs, and this system has continued for the past three to four hundred years. Accepting disciples born in brāhmaṇa families, they are bona fide spiritual masters who have the facility to worship the śālagrāma-śilā, which is worshiped with the Deity. As of this writing, śālagrāma-śilā worship has not yet been introduced in our Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement, but soon it will be introduced in all our temples as an essential function of arcana-mārga (Deity worship).
</div>
__NOTOC__{{CC_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}