CC Madhya 10.136 - Revision history

Elad: Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

2024-02-19T21:17:42Z

Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 19 February 2024
Line 17:		Line 17:

	<div class="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	''eta ~~śuni~~''~~’—hearing~~ this; ''sārvabhauma''~~—Sārvabhauma~~ Bhaṭṭācārya; ''prabhure''~~—unto~~ the Lord; ''puchila''~~—inquired~~; ''purī-gosāñi''~~—Īśvara~~ Purī; ''śūdra-sevaka''—a servant who is a ''śūdra''; ''kāṅhe ta''~~’—why~~; ''rākhila''~~—kept~~.		''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=eta&tab=syno_o&ds=1 eta] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=śuni’&tab=syno_o&ds=1 śuni’]'' — hearing this; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sārvabhauma&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sārvabhauma]'' — Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=prabhure&tab=syno_o&ds=1 prabhure]'' — unto the Lord; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=puchila&tab=syno_o&ds=1 puchila]'' — inquired; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=purī&tab=syno_o&ds=1 purī]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=gosāñi&tab=syno_o&ds=1 gosāñi]'' — Īśvara Purī; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=śūdra&tab=syno_o&ds=1 śūdra]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sevaka&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sevaka]'' — a servant who is a ''śūdra''; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kāṅhe&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kāṅhe] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ta’&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ta’]'' — why; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=rākhila&tab=syno_o&ds=1 rākhila]'' — kept.
	</div>		</div>

Kritika at 17:41, 31 July 2021

2021-07-31T17:41:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:41, 31 July 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~CC_Header~~\|{{~~PAGENAME}}~~}}		[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Madhya-lila Chapter 10\|C136]]
			<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta\|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Madhya\|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 10\|Chapter 10: The Lord's Return to Jagannātha Purī]]'''</div>
			<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=CC Madhya 10.135\|Madhya-līlā 10.135]] '''[[CC Madhya 10.135\|Madhya-līlā 10.135]] - [[CC Madhya 10.137\|Madhya-līlā 10.137]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=CC Madhya 10.137\|Madhya-līlā 10.137]]</div>
			{{CompareVersions\|CC\|Madhya 10.136\|CC 1975\|CC 1996}}
			{{RandomImage}}


	==== TEXT 136 ====		==== TEXT 136 ====

	<div id="~~text~~">		<div class="verse">
	eta śuni’ sārvabhauma prabhure puchila~~<br>~~		:eta śuni’ sārvabhauma prabhure puchila
	purī-gosāñi śūdra-sevaka kāṅhe ta’ rākhila~~<br>~~		:purī-gosāñi śūdra-sevaka kāṅhe ta’ rākhila
	</div>		</div>

Line 12:		Line 16:
	==== SYNONYMS ====		==== SYNONYMS ====

	<div id="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	eta ~~śuni’—hearing~~ this; ~~sārvabhauma—Sārvabhauma~~ Bhaṭṭācārya; ~~prabhure—unto~~ the Lord; ~~puchila—inquired~~; purī-~~gosāñi—Īśvara~~ Purī; śūdra-~~sevaka—a~~ servant who is a śūdra; kāṅhe ~~ta’—why~~; ~~rākhila—kept~~.		''eta śuni''’—hearing this; ''sārvabhauma''—Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya; ''prabhure''—unto the Lord; ''puchila''—inquired; ''purī-gosāñi''—Īśvara Purī; ''śūdra-sevaka''—a servant who is a ''śūdra''; ''kāṅhe ta''’—why; ''rākhila''—kept.
	</div>		</div>

Line 19:		Line 23:
	==== TRANSLATION ====		==== TRANSLATION ====

	<div id="translation">		<div class="translation">
	After hearing this, Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya asked Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, “Why did Īśvara Purī keep a servant who comes from a śūdra family?”		After hearing this, Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya asked Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, “Why did Īśvara Purī keep a servant who comes from a śūdra family?”
	</div>		</div>
Line 26:		Line 30:
	==== PURPORT ====		==== PURPORT ====

	<div id="purport">		<div class="purport">
	Both Kāśīśvara and Govinda were personal servants of Īśvara Purī. After Īśvara Purī’s demise, Kāśīśvara went to visit all the holy places of India. Following the orders of his spiritual master, Govinda immediately went to Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu for shelter. Govinda came from a śūdra family, but because he was initiated by Īśvara Purī, he was certainly a brāhmaṇa. Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya here asked Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu why Īśvara Purī accepted a disciple from a śūdra family. According to the smṛti-śāstra, which gives directions for the management of the varṇāśrama institution, a brāhmaṇa cannot accept a disciple from the lower castes. In other words, a kṣatriya, vaiśya or śūdra cannot be accepted as a servant. If a spiritual master accepts such a person, he is contaminated. Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya therefore asked why Īśvara Purī accepted a servant or disciple born of a śūdra family.		Both Kāśīśvara and Govinda were personal servants of Īśvara Purī. After Īśvara Purī’s demise, Kāśīśvara went to visit all the holy places of India. Following the orders of his spiritual master, Govinda immediately went to Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu for shelter. Govinda came from a ''śūdra'' family, but because he was initiated by Īśvara Purī, he was certainly a ''brāhmaṇa''. Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya here asked Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu why Īśvara Purī accepted a disciple from a ''śūdra'' family. According to the ''smṛti-śāstra'', which gives directions for the management of the ''varṇāśrama'' institution, a ''brāhmaṇa'' cannot accept a disciple from the lower castes. In other words, a ''kṣatriya, vaiśya'' or ''śūdra'' cannot be accepted as a servant. If a spiritual master accepts such a person, he is contaminated. Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya therefore asked why Īśvara Purī accepted a servant or disciple born of a ''śūdra'' family.

	In answer to this question, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu replied that His spiritual master, Īśvara Purī, was so empowered that he was as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As such, Īśvara Purī was the spiritual master of the whole world. He was not a servant of any mundane rule or regulation. An empowered spiritual master like Īśvara Purī can bestow his mercy upon anyone, irrespective of caste or creed. The conclusion is that an empowered spiritual master is authorized by Kṛṣṇa and his own guru and should therefore be considered as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. That is the verdict of Viśvanātha Cakravartī: sākṣād-dharitvena. An authorized spiritual master is as good as Hari, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As Hari is free to act as He likes, the empowered spiritual master is also free. As Hari is not subject to mundane rules and regulations, the spiritual master empowered by Him is also not subject. According to the Caitanya-caritāmṛta (Antya-līlā 7.11), kṛṣṇa-śakti vinā nahe tāra pravartana. An authorized spiritual master empowered by Kṛṣṇa can spread the glories of the holy name of the Lord, for he has power of attorney from the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In the mundane world, anyone possessing his master’s power of attorney can act on behalf of his master. Similarly, a spiritual master empowered by Kṛṣṇa through his own bona fide spiritual master should be considered as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. That is the meaning of sākṣād-dharitvena. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu therefore describes the activities of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the bona fide spiritual master as follows.		In answer to this question, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu replied that His spiritual master, Īśvara Purī, was so empowered that he was as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As such, Īśvara Purī was the spiritual master of the whole world. He was not a servant of any mundane rule or regulation. An empowered spiritual master like Īśvara Purī can bestow his mercy upon anyone, irrespective of caste or creed. The conclusion is that an empowered spiritual master is authorized by Kṛṣṇa and his own ''guru'' and should therefore be considered as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. That is the verdict of Viśvanātha Cakravartī: ''sākṣād-dharitvena''. An authorized spiritual master is as good as Hari, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As Hari is free to act as He likes, the empowered spiritual master is also free. As Hari is not subject to mundane rules and regulations, the spiritual master empowered by Him is also not subject. According to the [[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta\|''Caitanya-caritāmṛta'']] ([[CC Antya 7.11\|Antya-līlā 7.11]]), ''kṛṣṇa-śakti vinā nahe tāra pravartana.'' An authorized spiritual master empowered by Kṛṣṇa can spread the glories of the holy name of the Lord, for he has power of attorney from the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In the mundane world, anyone possessing his master’s power of attorney can act on behalf of his master. Similarly, a spiritual master empowered by Kṛṣṇa through his own bona fide spiritual master should be considered as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. That is the meaning of ''sākṣād-dharitvena''. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu therefore describes the activities of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the bona fide spiritual master as follows.
	</div>		</div>
	__NOTOC__~~{{CC_Footer\|{{PAGENAME}}}}~~

			<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=CC Madhya 10.135\|Madhya-līlā 10.135]] '''[[CC Madhya 10.135\|Madhya-līlā 10.135]] - [[CC Madhya 10.137\|Madhya-līlā 10.137]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=CC Madhya 10.137\|Madhya-līlā 10.137]]</div>
			__NOTOC__
			__NOEDITSECTION__

Acyuta: 1 revision(s)

2008-03-18T23:25:23Z

1 revision(s)

New page

{{CC_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}

==== TEXT 136 ====

<div id="text">
eta śuni’ sārvabhauma prabhure puchila<br>
purī-gosāñi śūdra-sevaka kāṅhe ta’ rākhila<br>
</div>

==== SYNONYMS ====

<div id="synonyms">
eta śuni’—hearing this; sārvabhauma—Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya; prabhure—unto the Lord; puchila—inquired; purī-gosāñi—Īśvara Purī; śūdra-sevaka—a servant who is a śūdra; kāṅhe ta’—why; rākhila—kept.
</div>

==== TRANSLATION ====

<div id="translation">
After hearing this, Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya asked Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, “Why did Īśvara Purī keep a servant who comes from a śūdra family?”
</div>

==== PURPORT ====

<div id="purport">
Both Kāśīśvara and Govinda were personal servants of Īśvara Purī. After Īśvara Purī’s demise, Kāśīśvara went to visit all the holy places of India. Following the orders of his spiritual master, Govinda immediately went to Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu for shelter. Govinda came from a śūdra family, but because he was initiated by Īśvara Purī, he was certainly a brāhmaṇa. Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya here asked Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu why Īśvara Purī accepted a disciple from a śūdra family. According to the smṛti-śāstra, which gives directions for the management of the varṇāśrama institution, a brāhmaṇa cannot accept a disciple from the lower castes. In other words, a kṣatriya, vaiśya or śūdra cannot be accepted as a servant. If a spiritual master accepts such a person, he is contaminated. Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya therefore asked why Īśvara Purī accepted a servant or disciple born of a śūdra family.

In answer to this question, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu replied that His spiritual master, Īśvara Purī, was so empowered that he was as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As such, Īśvara Purī was the spiritual master of the whole world. He was not a servant of any mundane rule or regulation. An empowered spiritual master like Īśvara Purī can bestow his mercy upon anyone, irrespective of caste or creed. The conclusion is that an empowered spiritual master is authorized by Kṛṣṇa and his own guru and should therefore be considered as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. That is the verdict of Viśvanātha Cakravartī: sākṣād-dharitvena. An authorized spiritual master is as good as Hari, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As Hari is free to act as He likes, the empowered spiritual master is also free. As Hari is not subject to mundane rules and regulations, the spiritual master empowered by Him is also not subject. According to the Caitanya-caritāmṛta (Antya-līlā 7.11), kṛṣṇa-śakti vinā nahe tāra pravartana. An authorized spiritual master empowered by Kṛṣṇa can spread the glories of the holy name of the Lord, for he has power of attorney from the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In the mundane world, anyone possessing his master’s power of attorney can act on behalf of his master. Similarly, a spiritual master empowered by Kṛṣṇa through his own bona fide spiritual master should be considered as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. That is the meaning of sākṣād-dharitvena. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu therefore describes the activities of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the bona fide spiritual master as follows.
</div>
__NOTOC__{{CC_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}