CC Madhya 12.61 - Revision history

Elad: Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

2024-02-19T21:35:32Z

Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:35, 19 February 2024
Line 17:		Line 17:

	<div class="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	''ei''~~—here~~ is; ''mahā-bhāgavata''—a first-class devotee; ''yāṅhāra darśane''~~—by~~ the sight of whom; ''vrajendra-nandana''~~—of~~ the son of the King of Vraja; ''smṛti''~~—remembrance~~; ''haya''~~—becomes~~; ''sarva-jane''~~—for~~ everyone.		''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ei&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ei]'' — here is; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=mahā&tab=syno_o&ds=1 mahā]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=bhāgavata&tab=syno_o&ds=1 bhāgavata]'' — a first-class devotee; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=yāṅhāra&tab=syno_o&ds=1 yāṅhāra] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=darśane&tab=syno_o&ds=1 darśane]'' — by the sight of whom; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vrajendra&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vrajendra]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=nandana&tab=syno_o&ds=1 nandana]'' — of the son of the King of Vraja; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=smṛti&tab=syno_o&ds=1 smṛti]'' — remembrance; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=haya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 haya]'' — becomes; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sarva&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sarva]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=jane&tab=syno_o&ds=1 jane]'' — for everyone.
	</div>		</div>

Kritika at 07:20, 10 August 2021

2021-08-10T07:20:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:20, 10 August 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~CC_Header~~\|{{~~PAGENAME}}~~}}		[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Madhya-lila Chapter 12\|C061]]
			<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta\|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Madhya\|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 12\|Chapter 12: The Cleansing of the Guṇḍicā Temple]]'''</div>
			<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=CC Madhya 12.60\|Madhya-līlā 12.60]] '''[[CC Madhya 12.60\|Madhya-līlā 12.60]] - [[CC Madhya 12.62\|Madhya-līlā 12.62]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=CC Madhya 12.62\|Madhya-līlā 12.62]]</div>
			{{CompareVersions\|CC\|Madhya 12.61\|CC 1975\|CC 1996}}
			{{RandomImage}}


	==== TEXT 61 ====		==== TEXT 61 ====

	<div id="~~text~~">		<div class="verse">
	ei-mahā-bhāgavata, yāṅhāra darśane~~<br>~~		:ei-mahā-bhāgavata, yāṅhāra darśane
	vrajendra-nandana-smṛti haya sarva-jane~~<br>~~		:vrajendra-nandana-smṛti haya sarva-jane
	</div>		</div>

Line 12:		Line 16:
	==== SYNONYMS ====		==== SYNONYMS ====

	<div id="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	~~ei—here~~ is; mahā-~~bhāgavata—a~~ first-class devotee; yāṅhāra ~~darśane—by~~ the sight of whom; vrajendra-~~nandana—of~~ the son of the King of Vraja; ~~smṛti—remembrance~~; ~~haya—becomes~~; sarva-~~jane—for~~ everyone.		''ei''—here is; ''mahā-bhāgavata''—a first-class devotee; ''yāṅhāra darśane''—by the sight of whom; ''vrajendra-nandana''—of the son of the King of Vraja; ''smṛti''—remembrance; ''haya''—becomes; ''sarva-jane''—for everyone.
	</div>		</div>

Line 19:		Line 23:
	==== TRANSLATION ====		==== TRANSLATION ====

	<div id="translation">		<div class="translation">
	“Here is a great devotee,” Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu said. “Upon seeing him, everyone can remember the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, son of Mahārāja Nanda.”		“Here is a great devotee,” Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu said. “Upon seeing him, everyone can remember the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, son of Mahārāja Nanda.”
	</div>		</div>
Line 26:		Line 30:
	==== PURPORT ====		==== PURPORT ====

	<div id="purport">		<div class="purport">
	In his Anubhāṣya, Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura states that a materialist mistakenly accepts the body and mind as the source of material enjoyment. In other words, a materialist accepts the bodily conception of life. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu did not regard the son of Mahārāja Pratāparudra with the idea that he was a materialist, being the son of a materialist. Nor did He consider Himself the enjoyer. Māyāvādī philosophers make a great mistake by assuming that the sac-cid-ānanda-vigraha ([[BS 5.1]]), the transcendental form of the Lord, is like a material body. However, there is no material contamination in transcendence, nor is there any possibility of imagining a spirituality in matter. One cannot accept matter as spirit. As indicated by the technical words bhauma ijya-dhīḥ ([[SB 10.84.13]]), materialistic Māyāvādīs imagine the form of God in matter, although according to their imagination, God is ultimately formless. This is simply mental speculation. Even though Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, He placed Himself in the position of a gopī. He also accepted the King’s son directly as the son of Mahārāja Nanda, Vrajendra-nandana Hari. This is perfect vision according to the direction of the Vedic culture, as confirmed in Śrīmad ~~Bhagavad~~-~~gītā~~: paṇḍitāḥ sama-darśinaḥ ([[BG 5.18]]). Such acceptance of the Absolute Truth according to Vaiṣṇava philosophy is explained in both the Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad (3.2.3) and the Kaṭha Upaniṣad (1.2.23) in the following words:		In his ''Anubhāṣya'', Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura states that a materialist mistakenly accepts the body and mind as the source of material enjoyment. In other words, a materialist accepts the bodily conception of life. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu did not regard the son of Mahārāja Pratāparudra with the idea that he was a materialist, being the son of a materialist. Nor did He consider Himself the enjoyer. Māyāvādī philosophers make a great mistake by assuming that the ''sac-cid-ānanda-vigraha'' (BS 5.1), the transcendental form of the Lord, is like a material body. However, there is no material contamination in transcendence, nor is there any possibility of imagining a spirituality in matter. One cannot accept matter as spirit. As indicated by the technical words ''bhauma ijya-dhīḥ'' ([[SB 10.84.13]]), materialistic Māyāvādīs imagine the form of God in matter, although according to their imagination, God is ultimately formless. This is simply mental speculation. Even though Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, He placed Himself in the position of a gopī. He also accepted the King’s son directly as the son of Mahārāja Nanda, Vrajendra-nandana Hari. This is perfect vision according to the direction of the Vedic culture, as confirmed in [[Srimad-Bhagavatam\|''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'']] : ''paṇḍitāḥ sama-darśinaḥ'' ([[BG 5.18]]). Such acceptance of the Absolute Truth according to Vaiṣṇava philosophy is explained in both the ''Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad'' (3.2.3) and the ''Kaṭha Upaniṣad'' (1.2.23) in the following words:

	:nāyam ātmā pravacanena labhyo		:nāyam ātmā pravacanena labhyo
Line 35:		Line 39:

	“The Supreme Lord is not obtained by expert explanations, by vast intelligence, nor even by much hearing. He is obtained only by one whom He Himself chooses. To such a person He manifests His own form.”		“The Supreme Lord is not obtained by expert explanations, by vast intelligence, nor even by much hearing. He is obtained only by one whom He Himself chooses. To such a person He manifests His own form.”
	The living entity is entangled in material existence due to his lack of such spiritual vision. Śrīla Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura has sung in his Kalyāṇa-kalpataru: saṁsāre āsiyā prakṛti bhajiyā ‘puruṣa’ abhimāne mari. When the living entity comes to the material world, he thinks himself the enjoyer. Thus he becomes more and more entangled.		The living entity is entangled in material existence due to his lack of such spiritual vision. Śrīla Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura has sung in his ''Kalyāṇa-kalpataru: saṁsāre āsiyā prakṛti bhajiyā ‘puruṣa’ abhimāne mari''. When the living entity comes to the material world, he thinks himself the enjoyer. Thus he becomes more and more entangled.
	</div>		</div>
	__NOTOC__~~{{CC_Footer\|{{PAGENAME}}}}~~

			<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=CC Madhya 12.60\|Madhya-līlā 12.60]] '''[[CC Madhya 12.60\|Madhya-līlā 12.60]] - [[CC Madhya 12.62\|Madhya-līlā 12.62]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=CC Madhya 12.62\|Madhya-līlā 12.62]]</div>
			__NOTOC__
			__NOEDITSECTION__

Acyuta: 1 revision(s)

2008-03-18T23:27:07Z

1 revision(s)

New page

{{CC_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}

==== TEXT 61 ====

<div id="text">
ei-mahā-bhāgavata, yāṅhāra darśane<br>
vrajendra-nandana-smṛti haya sarva-jane<br>
</div>

==== SYNONYMS ====

<div id="synonyms">
ei—here is; mahā-bhāgavata—a first-class devotee; yāṅhāra darśane—by the sight of whom; vrajendra-nandana—of the son of the King of Vraja; smṛti—remembrance; haya—becomes; sarva-jane—for everyone.
</div>

==== TRANSLATION ====

<div id="translation">
“Here is a great devotee,” Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu said. “Upon seeing him, everyone can remember the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, son of Mahārāja Nanda.”
</div>

==== PURPORT ====

<div id="purport">
In his Anubhāṣya, Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura states that a materialist mistakenly accepts the body and mind as the source of material enjoyment. In other words, a materialist accepts the bodily conception of life. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu did not regard the son of Mahārāja Pratāparudra with the idea that he was a materialist, being the son of a materialist. Nor did He consider Himself the enjoyer. Māyāvādī philosophers make a great mistake by assuming that the sac-cid-ānanda-vigraha ([[BS 5.1]]), the transcendental form of the Lord, is like a material body. However, there is no material contamination in transcendence, nor is there any possibility of imagining a spirituality in matter. One cannot accept matter as spirit. As indicated by the technical words bhauma ijya-dhīḥ ([[SB 10.84.13]]), materialistic Māyāvādīs imagine the form of God in matter, although according to their imagination, God is ultimately formless. This is simply mental speculation. Even though Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, He placed Himself in the position of a gopī. He also accepted the King’s son directly as the son of Mahārāja Nanda, Vrajendra-nandana Hari. This is perfect vision according to the direction of the Vedic culture, as confirmed in Śrīmad Bhagavad-gītā: paṇḍitāḥ sama-darśinaḥ ([[BG 5.18]]). Such acceptance of the Absolute Truth according to Vaiṣṇava philosophy is explained in both the Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad (3.2.3) and the Kaṭha Upaniṣad (1.2.23) in the following words:

:nāyam ātmā pravacanena labhyo
:na medhayā na bahunā śrutena
:yam evaiṣa vṛṇute tena labhyas
:tasyaiṣa ātmā vivṛṇute tanūṁ svām

“The Supreme Lord is not obtained by expert explanations, by vast intelligence, nor even by much hearing. He is obtained only by one whom He Himself chooses. To such a person He manifests His own form.”
The living entity is entangled in material existence due to his lack of such spiritual vision. Śrīla Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura has sung in his Kalyāṇa-kalpataru: saṁsāre āsiyā prakṛti bhajiyā ‘puruṣa’ abhimāne mari. When the living entity comes to the material world, he thinks himself the enjoyer. Thus he becomes more and more entangled.
</div>
__NOTOC__{{CC_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}