CC Madhya 6.135 - Revision history

Elad: Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

2024-02-19T23:39:32Z

Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:39, 19 February 2024
Line 17:		Line 17:

	<div class="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	''pramāṇera''~~—of~~ the evidences; ''madhye''~~—in~~ the midst; ''śruti''~~—the~~ Vedic version; ''pramāṇa''~~—evidence~~; ''pradhāna''~~—chief~~; ''śruti''~~—the~~ Vedic version; ''ye''~~—whatever~~; ''mukhya-artha''~~—chief~~ meaning; ''kahe''~~—says~~; ''sei se''~~—that~~ indeed; ''pramāṇa''~~—evidence~~.		''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=pramāṇera&tab=syno_o&ds=1 pramāṇera]'' — of the evidences; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=madhye&tab=syno_o&ds=1 madhye]'' — in the midst; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=śruti&tab=syno_o&ds=1 śruti]'' — the Vedic version; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=pramāṇa&tab=syno_o&ds=1 pramāṇa]'' — evidence; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=pradhāna&tab=syno_o&ds=1 pradhāna]'' — chief; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=śruti&tab=syno_o&ds=1 śruti]'' — the Vedic version; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ye&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ye]'' — whatever; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=mukhya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 mukhya]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=artha&tab=syno_o&ds=1 artha]'' — chief meaning; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kahe&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kahe]'' — says; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sei&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sei] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=se&tab=syno_o&ds=1 se]'' — that indeed; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=pramāṇa&tab=syno_o&ds=1 pramāṇa]'' — evidence.
	</div>		</div>

Soham at 09:47, 29 July 2021

2021-07-29T09:47:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:47, 29 July 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~CC_Header~~\|{{~~PAGENAME}}~~}}		[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Madhya-lila Chapter 06\|C135]]
			<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta\|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Madhya\|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 6\|Chapter 6: The Liberation of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya]]'''</div>
			<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=CC Madhya 6.134\|Madhya-līlā 6.134]] '''[[CC Madhya 6.134\|Madhya-līlā 6.134]] - [[CC Madhya 6.136\|Madhya-līlā 6.136]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=CC Madhya 6.136\|Madhya-līlā 6.136]]</div>
			{{CompareVersions\|CC\|Madhya 6.135\|CC 1975\|CC 1996}}
			{{RandomImage}}


	==== TEXT 135 ====		==== TEXT 135 ====

	<div id="~~text~~">		<div class="verse">
	pramāṇera madhye śruti pramāṇa—pradhāna~~<br>~~		:pramāṇera madhye śruti pramāṇa—pradhāna
	śruti ye mukhyārtha kahe, sei se pramāṇa~~<br>~~		:śruti ye mukhyārtha kahe, sei se pramāṇa
	</div>		</div>

Line 12:		Line 16:
	==== SYNONYMS ====		==== SYNONYMS ====

	<div id="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	~~pramāṇera—of~~ the evidences; ~~madhye—in~~ the midst; ~~śruti—the~~ Vedic version; ~~pramāṇa—evidence~~; ~~pradhāna—chief~~; ~~śruti—the~~ Vedic version; ~~ye—whatever~~; mukhya-~~artha—chief~~ meaning; ~~kahe—says~~; sei ~~se—that~~ indeed; ~~pramāṇa—evidence~~.		''pramāṇera''—of the evidences; ''madhye''—in the midst; ''śruti''—the Vedic version; ''pramāṇa''—evidence; ''pradhāna''—chief; ''śruti''—the Vedic version; ''ye''—whatever; ''mukhya-artha''—chief meaning; ''kahe''—says; ''sei se''—that indeed; ''pramāṇa''—evidence.
	</div>		</div>

Line 19:		Line 23:
	==== TRANSLATION ====		==== TRANSLATION ====

	<div id="translation">		<div class="translation">
	“Although there is other evidence, the evidence given in the Vedic version must be taken as foremost. Vedic versions understood directly are first-class evidence.”		“Although there is other evidence, the evidence given in the Vedic version must be taken as foremost. Vedic versions understood directly are first-class evidence.”
	</div>		</div>
Line 26:		Line 30:
	==== PURPORT ====		==== PURPORT ====

	<div id="purport">		<div class="purport">
	Works that should be consulted are Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī’s Tattva-sandarbha (10-11), Śrīla Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa’s commentary on that, and the following verses of the Brahma-sūtra: śāstra-yonitvāt (Vs. 1.1.3), tarkāpratiṣṭhānāt (Vs. 2.1.11) and śrutes tu śabda-mūlatvāt (Vs. 2.1.27), as commented upon by Śrī Rāmānujācārya, Śrī Madhvācārya, Śrī Nimbārkācārya and Śrīla Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa. In his book Sarva-saṁvādinī, Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī has noted that although there are ten kinds of evidence—direct perception, the Vedic version, historical reference, hypothesis and so on—and although they are all generally accepted as evidence, the person presenting a hypothesis, reading the Vedic version, perceiving or interpreting by his experience is certain to be imperfect in four ways. That is, he is subject to committing mistakes, to becoming illusioned, to cheating and to having imperfect senses. Although the evidence may be correct, the person himself is in danger of being misled due to his material defects. Apart from the direct presentation, there is a chance that an interpretation may not be perfect. Therefore the conclusion is that only a direct presentation can be considered evidence. An interpretation cannot be accepted as evidence, but may be considered proof of evidence.		Works that should be consulted are Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī’s ''Tattva-sandarbha'' (10-11), Śrīla Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa’s commentary on that, and the following verses of the ''Brahma-sūtra: śāstra-yonitvāt'' (Vs. 1.1.3), ''tarkāpratiṣṭhānāt'' (Vs. 2.1.11) and ''śrutes tu śabda-mūlatvāt'' (Vs. 2.1.27), as commented upon by Śrī Rāmānujācārya, Śrī Madhvācārya, Śrī Nimbārkācārya and Śrīla Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa. In his book ''Sarva-saṁvādinī'', Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī has noted that although there are ten kinds of evidence—direct perception, the Vedic version, historical reference, hypothesis and so on—and although they are all generally accepted as evidence, the person presenting a hypothesis, reading the Vedic version, perceiving or interpreting by his experience is certain to be imperfect in four ways. That is, he is subject to committing mistakes, to becoming illusioned, to cheating and to having imperfect senses. Although the evidence may be correct, the person himself is in danger of being misled due to his material defects. Apart from the direct presentation, there is a chance that an interpretation may not be perfect. Therefore the conclusion is that only a direct presentation can be considered evidence. An interpretation cannot be accepted as evidence, but may be considered proof of evidence.

	In the Bhagavad-gītā, at the very beginning it is stated:		In the [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)\|''Bhagavad-gītā'']], at the very beginning it is stated:

	:dhṛtarāṣṭra uvāca		:''dhṛtarāṣṭra uvāca''
	:dharma-kṣetre kuru-kṣetre samavetā yuyutsavaḥ		:''dharma-kṣetre kuru-kṣetre samavetā yuyutsavaḥ''
	:māmakāḥ pāṇḍavāś caiva kim akurvata sañjaya		:''māmakāḥ pāṇḍavāś caiva kim akurvata sañjaya''
	([[BG 1.1]])		([[BG 1.1 (1972)\|BG 1.1]])

	The statements of the Bhagavad-gītā are themselves proof that there is a place of religious pilgrimage named Kurukṣetra where the Pāṇḍavas and Kurus met to fight. After meeting there, what did they do? This was Dhṛtarāṣṭra’s inquiry to Sañjaya. Although these statements are very clear, atheists try to interpret different meanings of the words dharma-kṣetra and kuru-kṣetra. Therefore Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī has warned us not to depend on any kind of interpretation. It is better to take the verses as they are, without interpretation.		The statements of the [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)\|''Bhagavad-gītā'']] are themselves proof that there is a place of religious pilgrimage named Kurukṣetra where the Pāṇḍavas and Kurus met to fight. After meeting there, what did they do? This was Dhṛtarāṣṭra’s inquiry to Sañjaya. Although these statements are very clear, atheists try to interpret different meanings of the words ''dharma-kṣetra'' and ''kuru-kṣetra''. Therefore Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī has warned us not to depend on any kind of interpretation. It is better to take the verses as they are, without interpretation.
	</div>		</div>
	__NOTOC__~~{{CC_Footer\|{{PAGENAME}}}}~~

			<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=CC Madhya 6.134\|Madhya-līlā 6.134]] '''[[CC Madhya 6.134\|Madhya-līlā 6.134]] - [[CC Madhya 6.136\|Madhya-līlā 6.136]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=CC Madhya 6.136\|Madhya-līlā 6.136]]</div>
			__NOTOC__
			__NOEDITSECTION__

Acyuta: 1 revision(s)

2008-03-18T23:21:19Z

1 revision(s)

New page

{{CC_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}

==== TEXT 135 ====

<div id="text">
pramāṇera madhye śruti pramāṇa—pradhāna<br>
śruti ye mukhyārtha kahe, sei se pramāṇa<br>
</div>

==== SYNONYMS ====

<div id="synonyms">
pramāṇera—of the evidences; madhye—in the midst; śruti—the Vedic version; pramāṇa—evidence; pradhāna—chief; śruti—the Vedic version; ye—whatever; mukhya-artha—chief meaning; kahe—says; sei se—that indeed; pramāṇa—evidence.
</div>

==== TRANSLATION ====

<div id="translation">
“Although there is other evidence, the evidence given in the Vedic version must be taken as foremost. Vedic versions understood directly are first-class evidence.”
</div>

==== PURPORT ====

<div id="purport">
Works that should be consulted are Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī’s Tattva-sandarbha (10-11), Śrīla Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa’s commentary on that, and the following verses of the Brahma-sūtra: śāstra-yonitvāt (Vs. 1.1.3), tarkāpratiṣṭhānāt (Vs. 2.1.11) and śrutes tu śabda-mūlatvāt (Vs. 2.1.27), as commented upon by Śrī Rāmānujācārya, Śrī Madhvācārya, Śrī Nimbārkācārya and Śrīla Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa. In his book Sarva-saṁvādinī, Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī has noted that although there are ten kinds of evidence—direct perception, the Vedic version, historical reference, hypothesis and so on—and although they are all generally accepted as evidence, the person presenting a hypothesis, reading the Vedic version, perceiving or interpreting by his experience is certain to be imperfect in four ways. That is, he is subject to committing mistakes, to becoming illusioned, to cheating and to having imperfect senses. Although the evidence may be correct, the person himself is in danger of being misled due to his material defects. Apart from the direct presentation, there is a chance that an interpretation may not be perfect. Therefore the conclusion is that only a direct presentation can be considered evidence. An interpretation cannot be accepted as evidence, but may be considered proof of evidence.

In the Bhagavad-gītā, at the very beginning it is stated:

:dhṛtarāṣṭra uvāca
:dharma-kṣetre kuru-kṣetre samavetā yuyutsavaḥ
:māmakāḥ pāṇḍavāś caiva kim akurvata sañjaya
([[BG 1.1]])

The statements of the Bhagavad-gītā are themselves proof that there is a place of religious pilgrimage named Kurukṣetra where the Pāṇḍavas and Kurus met to fight. After meeting there, what did they do? This was Dhṛtarāṣṭra’s inquiry to Sañjaya. Although these statements are very clear, atheists try to interpret different meanings of the words dharma-kṣetra and kuru-kṣetra. Therefore Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī has warned us not to depend on any kind of interpretation. It is better to take the verses as they are, without interpretation.
</div>
__NOTOC__{{CC_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}