Vanibot: Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature

2020-01-27T18:32:53Z

Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 27 January 2020
Line 2:		Line 2:
	<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)\|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Madhya (1975)\|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 6 (1975)\|Chapter 6: The Liberation of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya]]'''</div>		<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)\|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Madhya (1975)\|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 6 (1975)\|Chapter 6: The Liberation of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya]]'''</div>
	<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=CC Madhya 6.136 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 6.136]] '''[[CC Madhya 6.136 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 6.136]] - [[CC Madhya 6.138 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 6.138]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=CC Madhya 6.138 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 6.138]]</div>		<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=CC Madhya 6.136 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 6.136]] '''[[CC Madhya 6.136 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 6.136]] - [[CC Madhya 6.138 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 6.138]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=CC Madhya 6.138 (1975)\|Madhya-līlā 6.138]]</div>
			{{CompareVersions\|CC\|Madhya 6.137\|CC 1975\|CC 1996}}
	{{RandomImage}}		{{RandomImage}}


	~~''Below is the 1996 edition text, ready to be substituted with the 1975 one using the compile form.''~~

	==== TEXT 137 ====		==== TEXT 137 ====
Line 11:		Line 10:
	<div class="verse">		<div class="verse">
	:svataḥ-pramāṇa veda satya yei kaya		:svataḥ-pramāṇa veda satya yei kaya
	:~~‘lakṣaṇā’~~ karile svataḥ-prāmāṇya-hāni haya		:'lakṣaṇā' karile svataḥ-prāmāṇya-hāni haya
	</div>		</div>

Line 25:		Line 24:

	<div class="translation">		<div class="translation">
	~~“The~~ Vedic statements are self-evident. Whatever is stated there must be accepted. If we interpret according to our own imagination, the authority of the Vedas is immediately lost.”		"The Vedic statements are self-evident. Whatever is stated there must be accepted. If we interpret according to our own imagination, the authority of the Vedas is immediately lost."
	</div>		</div>

Line 32:		Line 31:

	<div class="purport">		<div class="purport">
	Out of four main types of ~~evidence—direct~~ perception, hypothesis, historical reference and the ~~Vedas—Vedic~~ evidence is accepted as the foremost. If we want to interpret the Vedic version, we must imagine an interpretation according to what we want to do. First of all, we set forth such an interpretation as a suggestion or hypothesis. As such, it is not actually true, and the self-evident proof is lost.		Out of four main types of evidence-direct perception, hypothesis, historical reference and the Vedas-Vedic evidence is accepted as the foremost. If we want to interpret the Vedic version, we must imagine an interpretation according to what we want to do. First of all, we set forth such an interpretation as a suggestion or hypothesis. As such, it is not actually true, and the self-evident proof is lost.


			:Śrīla Madhvācārya, commenting on the aphorism dṛśyate tu (Vedānta-sūtra 2.1.6), quotes the Bhaviṣya Purāṇa as follows:

	~~Śrīla Madhvācārya, commenting on the aphorism dṛśyate tu (Vedānta~~-~~sūtra 2.1.6), quotes the Bhaviṣya Purāṇa as follows~~:		:ṛg-yajuḥ-sāmātharvāś ca
			:bhārataṁ pañcarātrakam
			:mūla-rāmāyaṇaṁ caiva
			:veda ity eva śabditāḥ

	:~~ṛg-yajuḥ-sāmātharvāś~~ ca ~~bhārataṁ pañcarātrakam~~		:purāṇāni ca yānīha
	~~:mūla-rāmāyaṇaṁ caiva veda ity eva śabditāḥ~~		:vaiṣṇavāni vido viduḥ
	:~~purāṇāni ca yānīha~~ vaiṣṇavāni vido viduḥ		:svataḥ-prāmāṇyam eteṣāṁ
	:svataḥ-prāmāṇyam eteṣāṁ nātra kiñcid vicāryate		:nātra kiñcid vicāryate

	The Ṛg Veda, Yajur Veda, Sāma Veda, Atharva Veda, Mahābhārata, Pañcarātra and original Rāmāyaṇa are all considered Vedic literature. The Purāṇas (such as the Brahma-vaivarta Purāṇa, Nāradīya Purāṇa, Viṣṇu Purāṇa and Bhāgavata Purāṇa) are especially meant for Vaiṣṇavas and are also Vedic literature. As such, whatever is stated within the Purāṇas, Mahābhārata and Rāmāyaṇa is self-evident. There is no need for interpretation. The Bhagavad-gītā is also within the Mahābhārata; therefore all the statements of the Bhagavad-gītā are self-evident. There is no need for interpretation, and if we do interpret, the entire authority of the Vedic literature is lost.		The Ṛg Veda, Yajur Veda, Sāma Veda, Atharva Veda, Mahābhārata, Pañcarātra and original Rāmāyaṇa are all considered Vedic literature. The Purāṇas (such as the Brahma-vaivarta Purāṇa, Nāradīya Purāṇa, Viṣṇu Purāṇa and Bhāgavata Purāṇa) are especially meant for Vaiṣṇavas and are also Vedic literature. As such, whatever is stated within the Purāṇas, Mahābhārata and Rāmāyaṇa is self-evident. There is no need for interpretation. The Bhagavad-gītā is also within the Mahābhārata; therefore all the statements of the Bhagavad-gītā are self-evident. There is no need for interpretation, and if we do interpret, the entire authority of the Vedic literature is lost.

Vanibot: Vanibot #0027: CCMirror - Mirror CC's 1996 edition to form a basis for 1975

2019-03-13T02:22:51Z

Vanibot #0027: CCMirror - Mirror CC's 1996 edition to form a basis for 1975

New page

[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975) - Madhya-lila Chapter 06|C137]]
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Madhya (1975)|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 6 (1975)|Chapter 6: The Liberation of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 6.136 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 6.136]] '''[[CC Madhya 6.136 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 6.136]] - [[CC Madhya 6.138 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 6.138]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 6.138 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 6.138]]</div>
{{RandomImage}}

''Below is the 1996 edition text, ready to be substituted with the 1975 one using the compile form.''

==== TEXT 137 ====

<div class="verse">
:svataḥ-pramāṇa veda satya yei kaya
:‘lakṣaṇā’ karile svataḥ-prāmāṇya-hāni haya
</div>

==== SYNONYMS ====

<div class="synonyms">
svataḥ-pramāṇa—self-evidence; veda—Vedic literature; satya—truth; yei—whatever; kaya—say; lakṣaṇā—interpretation; karile—by making; svataḥ-prāmāṇya—self-evidential proof; hāni—lost; haya—becomes.
</div>

==== TRANSLATION ====

<div class="translation">
“The Vedic statements are self-evident. Whatever is stated there must be accepted. If we interpret according to our own imagination, the authority of the Vedas is immediately lost.”
</div>

==== PURPORT ====

<div class="purport">
Out of four main types of evidence—direct perception, hypothesis, historical reference and the Vedas—Vedic evidence is accepted as the foremost. If we want to interpret the Vedic version, we must imagine an interpretation according to what we want to do. First of all, we set forth such an interpretation as a suggestion or hypothesis. As such, it is not actually true, and the self-evident proof is lost.

Śrīla Madhvācārya, commenting on the aphorism dṛśyate tu (Vedānta-sūtra 2.1.6), quotes the Bhaviṣya Purāṇa as follows:

:ṛg-yajuḥ-sāmātharvāś ca bhārataṁ pañcarātrakam
:mūla-rāmāyaṇaṁ caiva veda ity eva śabditāḥ
:purāṇāni ca yānīha vaiṣṇavāni vido viduḥ
:svataḥ-prāmāṇyam eteṣāṁ nātra kiñcid vicāryate

The Ṛg Veda, Yajur Veda, Sāma Veda, Atharva Veda, Mahābhārata, Pañcarātra and original Rāmāyaṇa are all considered Vedic literature. The Purāṇas (such as the Brahma-vaivarta Purāṇa, Nāradīya Purāṇa, Viṣṇu Purāṇa and Bhāgavata Purāṇa) are especially meant for Vaiṣṇavas and are also Vedic literature. As such, whatever is stated within the Purāṇas, Mahābhārata and Rāmāyaṇa is self-evident. There is no need for interpretation. The Bhagavad-gītā is also within the Mahābhārata; therefore all the statements of the Bhagavad-gītā are self-evident. There is no need for interpretation, and if we do interpret, the entire authority of the Vedic literature is lost.
</div>

<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 6.136 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 6.136]] '''[[CC Madhya 6.136 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 6.136]] - [[CC Madhya 6.138 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 6.138]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 6.138 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 6.138]]</div>
__NOTOC__
__NOEDITSECTION__

CC Madhya 6.137 (1975) - Revision history

Vanibot: Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature

Vanibot: Vanibot #0027: CCMirror - Mirror CC's 1996 edition to form a basis for 1975