SB 11.25.24 - Revision history

Elad: Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

2024-02-17T20:37:42Z

Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 17 February 2024
Line 23:		Line 23:

	<div class="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	~~kaivalyam—absolute~~; ~~sāttvikam—in~~ the mode of goodness; ~~jñānam—knowledge~~; ~~rajaḥ—in~~ the mode of passion; ~~vaikalpikam—manifold~~; ~~ca—and~~; ~~yat—which~~; ~~prākṛtam—materialistic~~; ~~tāmasam—in~~ the mode of ignorance; ~~jñānam—knowledge~~; mat-~~niṣṭham—concentrated~~ upon Me; ~~nirguṇam—transcendental~~; ~~smṛtam—is~~ considered.		''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kaivalyam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kaivalyam]'' — absolute; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sāttvikam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sāttvikam]'' — in the mode of goodness; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=jñānam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 jñānam]'' — knowledge; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=rajaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 rajaḥ]'' — in the mode of passion; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vaikalpikam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vaikalpikam]'' — manifold; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ca&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ca]'' — and; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=yat&tab=syno_o&ds=1 yat]'' — which; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=prākṛtam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 prākṛtam]'' — materialistic; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tāmasam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tāmasam]'' — in the mode of ignorance; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=jñānam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 jñānam]'' — knowledge; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=mat&tab=syno_o&ds=1 mat]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=niṣṭham&tab=syno_o&ds=1 niṣṭham]'' — concentrated upon Me; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=nirguṇam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 nirguṇam]'' — transcendental; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=smṛtam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 smṛtam]'' — is considered.
	</div>		</div>

Kritika at 17:53, 3 July 2021

2021-07-03T17:53:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:53, 3 July 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{SB_Header\|{{PAGENAME}}}}~~
	{{info		{{info
	\|speaker=Lord ~~Krsna~~ the Supreme Personality of Godhead		\|speaker=Lord Kṛṣṇa the Supreme Personality of Godhead
	\|listener=Uddhava		\|listener=Uddhava
	}}		}}
			[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam - Canto 11 Chapter 25]]
			[[Category:Bhagavatam Verses Spoken by Lord Krsna - Vanisource\|112524]]
			<div style="float:left">'''[[Srimad-Bhagavatam]] - [[SB 11\|Eleventh Canto]] - [[SB 11.25: The Three Modes of Nature and Beyond\|Chapter 25: The Three Modes of Nature and Beyond]]'''</div>
			<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=SB 11.25.23]] '''[[SB 11.25.23]] - [[SB 11.25.25]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=SB 11.25.25]]</div>
			{{RandomImage}}

			{{SBnotice}}
	==== TEXT 24 ====		==== TEXT 24 ====

	<div id="~~text~~">		<div class="verse">
	kaivalyaṁ sāttvikaṁ jñānaṁ~~<br>~~		:kaivalyaṁ sāttvikaṁ jñānaṁ
	rajo vaikalpikaṁ ca yat~~<br>~~		:rajo vaikalpikaṁ ca yat
	prākṛtaṁ tāmasaṁ jñānaṁ~~<br>~~		:prākṛtaṁ tāmasaṁ jñānaṁ
	man-niṣṭhaṁ nirguṇaṁ smṛtam~~<br>~~		:man-niṣṭhaṁ nirguṇaṁ smṛtam
	</div>		</div>

Line 17:		Line 22:
	==== SYNONYMS ====		==== SYNONYMS ====

	<div id="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	kaivalyam—absolute; sāttvikam—in the mode of goodness; jñānam—knowledge; rajaḥ—in the mode of passion; vaikalpikam—manifold; ca—and; yat—which; prākṛtam—materialistic; tāmasam—in the mode of ignorance; jñānam—knowledge; mat-niṣṭham—concentrated upon Me; nirguṇam—transcendental; smṛtam—is considered.		kaivalyam—absolute; sāttvikam—in the mode of goodness; jñānam—knowledge; rajaḥ—in the mode of passion; vaikalpikam—manifold; ca—and; yat—which; prākṛtam—materialistic; tāmasam—in the mode of ignorance; jñānam—knowledge; mat-niṣṭham—concentrated upon Me; nirguṇam—transcendental; smṛtam—is considered.
	</div>		</div>

			{{SBcollapse}}
	==== TRANSLATION ====		==== TRANSLATION ====

	<div id="translation">		<div class="translation">
	Absolute knowledge is in the mode of goodness, knowledge based on duality is in the mode of passion, and foolish, materialistic knowledge is in the mode of ignorance. Knowledge based upon Me, however, is understood to be transcendental.		Absolute knowledge is in the mode of goodness, knowledge based on duality is in the mode of passion, and foolish, materialistic knowledge is in the mode of ignorance. Knowledge based upon Me, however, is understood to be transcendental.
	</div>		</div>
Line 31:		Line 36:
	==== PURPORT ====		==== PURPORT ====

	<div id="purport">		<div class="purport">
	The Lord clearly explains here that spiritual knowledge of His supreme personality is transcendental to ordinary religious knowledge in the mode of goodness. In the mode of goodness one understands the existence of a higher spiritual nature within all things. In the mode of passion one acquires scientific knowledge of the material body. And in the mode of ignorance one fixes one's mind on the sense objects without higher awareness, perceiving things as a small child or a retarded person does.		The Lord clearly explains here that spiritual knowledge of His supreme personality is transcendental to ordinary religious knowledge in the mode of goodness. In the mode of goodness one understands the existence of a higher spiritual nature within all things. In the mode of passion one acquires scientific knowledge of the material body. And in the mode of ignorance one fixes one's mind on the sense objects without higher awareness, perceiving things as a small child or a retarded person does.

	Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī elaborately explains in his commentary on this verse that the material mode of goodness does not award perfect knowledge of the Absolute Truth. He quotes from Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam ([[SB 6.14.2]]), proving that many great demigods in the mode of goodness could not understand the transcendental personality of Lord Kṛṣṇa. In the material mode of goodness, one becomes pious or religious, aware of a higher, spiritual nature. On the spiritual platform of purified goodness, however, one establishes a direct, loving relationship with the Absolute Truth, rendering service to the Lord rather than merely maintaining a connection to mundane piety. In the mode of passion the conditioned soul speculates about the reality of his own existence and of the world around him, and considers speculatively the existence of a kingdom of God. In the mode of ignorance one acquires knowledge for sense gratification, absorbing the mind in varieties of eating, sleeping, defending and sex, without any higher purpose. Thus, within the modes of nature the conditioned souls are trying to gratify their senses, or else they are trying to free themselves from sense gratification. But they cannot directly engage themselves in their constitutional, liberated activities until they come to the transcendental position of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, beyond the modes of nature.		Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī elaborately explains in his commentary on this verse that the material mode of goodness does not award perfect knowledge of the Absolute Truth. He quotes from [[Srimad-Bhagavatam\|''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'']] ([[SB 6.14.2]]), proving that many great demigods in the mode of goodness could not understand the transcendental personality of Lord Kṛṣṇa. In the material mode of goodness, one becomes pious or religious, aware of a higher, spiritual nature. On the spiritual platform of purified goodness, however, one establishes a direct, loving relationship with the Absolute Truth, rendering service to the Lord rather than merely maintaining a connection to mundane piety. In the mode of passion the conditioned soul speculates about the reality of his own existence and of the world around him, and considers speculatively the existence of a kingdom of God. In the mode of ignorance one acquires knowledge for sense gratification, absorbing the mind in varieties of eating, sleeping, defending and sex, without any higher purpose. Thus, within the modes of nature the conditioned souls are trying to gratify their senses, or else they are trying to free themselves from sense gratification. But they cannot directly engage themselves in their constitutional, liberated activities until they come to the transcendental position of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, beyond the modes of nature.
	</div>		</div>
	__NOTOC__~~{{SB_Footer\|{{PAGENAME}}}}~~		</div>
			</div>


			<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=SB 11.25.23]] '''[[SB 11.25.23]] - [[SB 11.25.25]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=SB 11.25.25]]</div>
			__NOTOC__
			__NOEDITSECTION__

Acyuta: 1 revision(s)

2008-03-17T12:48:59Z

1 revision(s)

New page

{{SB_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{info
|speaker=Lord Krsna the Supreme Personality of Godhead
|listener=Uddhava
}}

==== TEXT 24 ====

<div id="text">
kaivalyaṁ sāttvikaṁ jñānaṁ<br>
rajo vaikalpikaṁ ca yat<br>
prākṛtaṁ tāmasaṁ jñānaṁ<br>
man-niṣṭhaṁ nirguṇaṁ smṛtam<br>
</div>

==== SYNONYMS ====

<div id="synonyms">
kaivalyam—absolute; sāttvikam—in the mode of goodness; jñānam—knowledge; rajaḥ—in the mode of passion; vaikalpikam—manifold; ca—and; yat—which; prākṛtam—materialistic; tāmasam—in the mode of ignorance; jñānam—knowledge; mat-niṣṭham—concentrated upon Me; nirguṇam—transcendental; smṛtam—is considered.
</div>

==== TRANSLATION ====

<div id="translation">
Absolute knowledge is in the mode of goodness, knowledge based on duality is in the mode of passion, and foolish, materialistic knowledge is in the mode of ignorance. Knowledge based upon Me, however, is understood to be transcendental.
</div>

==== PURPORT ====

<div id="purport">
The Lord clearly explains here that spiritual knowledge of His supreme personality is transcendental to ordinary religious knowledge in the mode of goodness. In the mode of goodness one understands the existence of a higher spiritual nature within all things. In the mode of passion one acquires scientific knowledge of the material body. And in the mode of ignorance one fixes one's mind on the sense objects without higher awareness, perceiving things as a small child or a retarded person does.

Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī elaborately explains in his commentary on this verse that the material mode of goodness does not award perfect knowledge of the Absolute Truth. He quotes from Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam ([[SB 6.14.2]]), proving that many great demigods in the mode of goodness could not understand the transcendental personality of Lord Kṛṣṇa. In the material mode of goodness, one becomes pious or religious, aware of a higher, spiritual nature. On the spiritual platform of purified goodness, however, one establishes a direct, loving relationship with the Absolute Truth, rendering service to the Lord rather than merely maintaining a connection to mundane piety. In the mode of passion the conditioned soul speculates about the reality of his own existence and of the world around him, and considers speculatively the existence of a kingdom of God. In the mode of ignorance one acquires knowledge for sense gratification, absorbing the mind in varieties of eating, sleeping, defending and sex, without any higher purpose. Thus, within the modes of nature the conditioned souls are trying to gratify their senses, or else they are trying to free themselves from sense gratification. But they cannot directly engage themselves in their constitutional, liberated activities until they come to the transcendental position of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, beyond the modes of nature.
</div>
__NOTOC__{{SB_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}