SB 5.10.23 - Revision history

Elad: Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

2024-02-18T22:03:25Z

Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 18 February 2024
Line 23:		Line 23:

	<div class="synonyms">		<div class="synonyms">
	''śāstā''~~—the~~ governor; ''abhigoptā''—a well-wisher of the citizens as a father is the well-wisher of his children; ''nṛ-patiḥ''~~—the~~ king; ''prajānām''~~—of~~ the citizens; ''yaḥ''~~—one~~ who; ''kiṅkaraḥ''~~—order~~ carrier; ''vai''~~—indeed~~; ''na''~~—not~~; ''pinaṣṭi piṣṭam''~~—grinds~~ what is already ground; ''sva-dharmam''~~—one~~'s own occupational duty; ''ārādhanam''~~—worshiping~~; ''acyutasya''~~—of~~ the Supreme Personality of Godhead; ''yat''~~—which~~; ''īhamānaḥ''~~—performing~~; ''vijahāti''~~—they~~ are released from; ''agha-ogham''~~—all~~ kinds of sinful activity and faulty action.		''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=śāstā&tab=syno_o&ds=1 śāstā]'' — the governor; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=abhigoptā&tab=syno_o&ds=1 abhigoptā]'' — a well-wisher of the citizens as a father is the well-wisher of his children; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=nṛ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 nṛ]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=patiḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 patiḥ]'' — the king; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=prajānām&tab=syno_o&ds=1 prajānām]'' — of the citizens; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=yaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 yaḥ]'' — one who; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kiṅkaraḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kiṅkaraḥ]'' — order carrier; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vai&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vai]'' — indeed; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=na&tab=syno_o&ds=1 na]'' — not; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=pinaṣṭi&tab=syno_o&ds=1 pinaṣṭi] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=piṣṭam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 piṣṭam]'' — grinds what is already ground; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sva&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sva]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=dharmam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 dharmam]'' — one's own occupational duty; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ārādhanam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ārādhanam]'' — worshiping; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=acyutasya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 acyutasya]'' — of the Supreme Personality of Godhead; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=yat&tab=syno_o&ds=1 yat]'' — which; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=īhamānaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 īhamānaḥ]'' — performing; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vijahāti&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vijahāti]'' — they are released from; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=agha&tab=syno_o&ds=1 agha]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ogham&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ogham]'' — all kinds of sinful activity and faulty action.
	</div>		</div>

Mudita at 11:21, 14 May 2021

2021-05-14T11:21:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 14 May 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{SB_Header\|{{PAGENAME}}}}~~
	{{info		{{info
	\|speaker=King ~~Rahugana~~		\|speaker=King Rahūgaṇa
	\|listener=~~Jada~~ Bharata		\|listener=Jaḍa Bharata
	}}		}}
			[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam - Canto 05 Chapter 10]]
			[[Category:Bhagavatam Verses Spoken by Rahugana Maharaja - Vanisource\|051023]]
			<div style="float:left">'''[[Srimad-Bhagavatam]] - [[SB 5\|Fifth Canto]] - [[SB 5.10: The Discussion Between Jada Bharata and Maharaja Rahugana\|Chapter 10: The Discussion Between Jaḍa Bharata and Mahārāja Rahūgaṇa]]'''</div>
			<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=SB 5.10.22]] '''[[SB 5.10.22]] - [[SB 5.10.24]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=SB 5.10.24]]</div>
			{{RandomImage}}


	==== TEXT 23 ====		==== TEXT 23 ====

			<div class="verse">
	<div id="~~text~~">		:śāstābhigoptā nṛpatiḥ prajānāṁ
	śāstābhigoptā nṛpatiḥ prajānāṁ~~<br>~~		:yaḥ kiṅkaro vai na pinaṣṭi piṣṭam
	yaḥ kiṅkaro vai na pinaṣṭi piṣṭam~~<br>~~		:sva-dharmam ārādhanam acyutasya
	sva-dharmam ārādhanam acyutasya~~<br>~~		:yad īhamāno vijahāty aghaugham
	yad īhamāno vijahāty aghaugham~~<br>~~
	</div>		</div>

Line 17:		Line 22:
	==== SYNONYMS ====		==== SYNONYMS ====

			<div class="synonyms">
	<div id="synonyms">		''śāstā''—the governor; ''abhigoptā''—a well-wisher of the citizens as a father is the well-wisher of his children; ''nṛ-patiḥ''—the king; ''prajānām''—of the citizens; ''yaḥ''—one who; ''kiṅkaraḥ''—order carrier; ''vai''—indeed; ''na''—not; ''pinaṣṭi piṣṭam''—grinds what is already ground; ''sva-dharmam''—one's own occupational duty; ''ārādhanam''—worshiping; ''acyutasya''—of the Supreme Personality of Godhead; ''yat''—which; ''īhamānaḥ''—performing; ''vijahāti''—they are released from; ''agha-ogham''—all kinds of sinful activity and faulty action.
	~~śāstā—the~~ governor; ~~abhigoptā—a~~ well-wisher of the citizens as a father is the well-wisher of his children; nṛ-~~patiḥ—the~~ king; ~~prajānām—of~~ the citizens; ~~yaḥ—one~~ who; ~~kiṅkaraḥ—order~~ carrier; ~~vai—indeed~~; ~~na—not~~; pinaṣṭi ~~piṣṭam—grinds~~ what is already ground; sva-~~dharmam—one~~'s own occupational duty; ~~ārādhanam—worshiping~~; ~~acyutasya—of~~ the Supreme Personality of Godhead; ~~yat—which~~; ~~īhamānaḥ—performing~~; ~~vijahāti—they~~ are released from; agha-~~ogham—all~~ kinds of sinful activity and faulty action.
	</div>		</div>

Line 25:		Line 29:
	==== TRANSLATION ====		==== TRANSLATION ====

			<div class="translation">
	<div id="translation">
	My dear sir, you have said that the relationship between the king and the subject or between the master and the servant are not eternal, but although such relationships are temporary, when a person takes the position of a king, his duty is to rule the citizens and punish those who are disobedient to the laws. By punishing them, he teaches the citizens to obey the laws of the state. Again, you have said that punishing a person who is deaf and dumb is like chewing the chewed or grinding the pulp; that is to say, there is no benefit in it. However, if one is engaged in his own occupational duty as ordered by the Supreme Lord, his sinful activities are certainly diminished. Therefore if one is engaged in his occupational duty by force, he benefits because he can vanquish all his sinful activities in that way.		My dear sir, you have said that the relationship between the king and the subject or between the master and the servant are not eternal, but although such relationships are temporary, when a person takes the position of a king, his duty is to rule the citizens and punish those who are disobedient to the laws. By punishing them, he teaches the citizens to obey the laws of the state. Again, you have said that punishing a person who is deaf and dumb is like chewing the chewed or grinding the pulp; that is to say, there is no benefit in it. However, if one is engaged in his own occupational duty as ordered by the Supreme Lord, his sinful activities are certainly diminished. Therefore if one is engaged in his occupational duty by force, he benefits because he can vanquish all his sinful activities in that way.
	</div>		</div>
Line 32:		Line 35:

	==== PURPORT ====		==== PURPORT ====

			<div class="purport">
			This argument offered by Mahārāja Rahūgaṇa is certainly very effective. In his ''Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu'' (1.2.4), Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī says, ''tasmāt kenāpy upāyena manaḥ kṛṣṇe niveśayet:'' ([[SB 7.1.32]]) somehow or other, one should engage in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Actually every living being is an eternal servant of Kṛṣṇa, but due to forgetfulness, a living entity engages himself as an eternal servant of ''māyā''. As long as one is engaged in ''māyā's'' service, he cannot be happy. Our Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement aims at engaging people in Lord Kṛṣṇa's service. That will help them become freed from all material contamination and sinful activity. This is confirmed in ''Bhagavad-gītā'' ([[BG 4.10]]): ''vīta-rāga-bhaya-krodhāḥ''. By becoming detached from material activities, we will be freed from fear and anger. By austerity, one becomes purified and eligible to return home, back to Godhead. The duty of the king is to rule his citizens in such a way that they can become Kṛṣṇa conscious. This would be very beneficial for everyone. Unfortunately the king or president engages people in sense gratification instead of the Lord's service, and such activities are certainly not beneficial for anyone. King Rahūgaṇa tried to engage Jaḍa Bharata in carrying the palanquin, which is a form of sense gratification for the King. However, if one is engaged as a palanquin carrier in the Lord's service, that is certainly beneficial. In this godless civilization, if a president engages people somehow or other in devotional service or the awakening of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, he renders the very best service to the citizens.
			</div>


	<div id="~~purport~~">		<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png\|link=SB 5.10.22]] '''[[SB 5.10.22]] - [[SB 5.10.24]]''' [[File:Go-next.png\|link=SB 5.10.24]]</div>
	~~This argument offered by Mahārāja Rahūgaṇa is certainly very effective. In his Bhakti~~-~~rasāmṛta-sindhu (1~~.~~2.4), Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī says, tasmāt kenāpy upāyena manaḥ kṛṣṇe niveśayet: ([[~~SB 7.1.32]]) somehow or other, one should engage in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Actually every living being is an eternal servant of Kṛṣṇa, but due to forgetfulness, a living entity engages himself as an eternal servant of māyā. As long as one is engaged in māyā'~~s service, he cannot be happy. Our Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement aims at engaging people in Lord Kṛṣṇa~~'~~s service~~. ~~That will help them become freed from all material contamination and sinful activity~~. ~~This is confirmed in Bhagavad~~-~~gītā (~~[[~~BG 4~~.10]]): ~~vīta~~-~~rāga-bhaya-krodhāḥ~~. ~~By becoming detached from material activities, we will be freed from fear and anger~~. ~~By austerity, one becomes purified and eligible to return home, back to Godhead~~. The duty of the king is to rule his citizens in such a way that they can become Kṛṣṇa conscious. This would be very beneficial for everyone. Unfortunately the king or president engages people in sense gratification instead of the Lord's service, and such activities are certainly not beneficial for anyone. King Rahūgaṇa tried to engage Jaḍa Bharata in carrying the palanquin, which is a form of sense gratification for the King. However, if one is engaged as a palanquin carrier in the Lord's service, that is certainly beneficial. In this godless civilization, if a president engages people somehow or other in devotional service or the awakening of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, he renders the very best service to the citizens.		__NOTOC__
	</div>		__NOEDITSECTION__
	__NOTOC__~~{{SB_Footer\|{{PAGENAME}}}}~~

Acyuta: 1 revision(s)

2008-03-20T21:57:12Z

1 revision(s)

New page

{{SB_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{info
|speaker=King Rahugana
|listener=Jada Bharata
}}
==== TEXT 23 ====

<div id="text">
śāstābhigoptā nṛpatiḥ prajānāṁ<br>
yaḥ kiṅkaro vai na pinaṣṭi piṣṭam<br>
sva-dharmam ārādhanam acyutasya<br>
yad īhamāno vijahāty aghaugham<br>
</div>

==== SYNONYMS ====

<div id="synonyms">
śāstā—the governor; abhigoptā—a well-wisher of the citizens as a father is the well-wisher of his children; nṛ-patiḥ—the king; prajānām—of the citizens; yaḥ—one who; kiṅkaraḥ—order carrier; vai—indeed; na—not; pinaṣṭi piṣṭam—grinds what is already ground; sva-dharmam—one's own occupational duty; ārādhanam—worshiping; acyutasya—of the Supreme Personality of Godhead; yat—which; īhamānaḥ—performing; vijahāti—they are released from; agha-ogham—all kinds of sinful activity and faulty action.
</div>

==== TRANSLATION ====

<div id="translation">
My dear sir, you have said that the relationship between the king and the subject or between the master and the servant are not eternal, but although such relationships are temporary, when a person takes the position of a king, his duty is to rule the citizens and punish those who are disobedient to the laws. By punishing them, he teaches the citizens to obey the laws of the state. Again, you have said that punishing a person who is deaf and dumb is like chewing the chewed or grinding the pulp; that is to say, there is no benefit in it. However, if one is engaged in his own occupational duty as ordered by the Supreme Lord, his sinful activities are certainly diminished. Therefore if one is engaged in his occupational duty by force, he benefits because he can vanquish all his sinful activities in that way.
</div>

==== PURPORT ====

<div id="purport">
This argument offered by Mahārāja Rahūgaṇa is certainly very effective. In his Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu (1.2.4), Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī says, tasmāt kenāpy upāyena manaḥ kṛṣṇe niveśayet: ([[SB 7.1.32]]) somehow or other, one should engage in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Actually every living being is an eternal servant of Kṛṣṇa, but due to forgetfulness, a living entity engages himself as an eternal servant of māyā. As long as one is engaged in māyā's service, he cannot be happy. Our Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement aims at engaging people in Lord Kṛṣṇa's service. That will help them become freed from all material contamination and sinful activity. This is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā ([[BG 4.10]]): vīta-rāga-bhaya-krodhāḥ. By becoming detached from material activities, we will be freed from fear and anger. By austerity, one becomes purified and eligible to return home, back to Godhead. The duty of the king is to rule his citizens in such a way that they can become Kṛṣṇa conscious. This would be very beneficial for everyone. Unfortunately the king or president engages people in sense gratification instead of the Lord's service, and such activities are certainly not beneficial for anyone. King Rahūgaṇa tried to engage Jaḍa Bharata in carrying the palanquin, which is a form of sense gratification for the King. However, if one is engaged as a palanquin carrier in the Lord's service, that is certainly beneficial. In this godless civilization, if a president engages people somehow or other in devotional service or the awakening of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, he renders the very best service to the citizens.
</div>
__NOTOC__{{SB_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}