SB 1.18.50 (1965): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "<div style="float:left">link=SB (1965) Eighteenth Chapter - Maharaj Parikshit Cursed By A Brahmin Boy '''[[SB (1965) Eighteenth Chapter - Maharaj Pari...") |
(Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam (1962-1965) - Canto 01 Chapter 18]] | |||
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB (1965) Eighteenth Chapter - Maharaj Parikshit Cursed By A Brahmin Boy]] '''[[SB (1965) Eighteenth Chapter - Maharaj Parikshit Cursed By A Brahmin Boy]]'''</div> | <div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB (1965) Eighteenth Chapter - Maharaj Parikshit Cursed By A Brahmin Boy]] '''[[SB (1965) Eighteenth Chapter - Maharaj Parikshit Cursed By A Brahmin Boy]]'''</div> | ||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.18.49 (1965)]] '''[[SB 1.18.49 (1965)]] - [[SB 1.19.1 (1965)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.19.1 (1965)]]</div> | <div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.18.49 (1965)]] '''[[SB 1.18.49 (1965)]] - [[SB 1.19.1 (1965)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.19.1 (1965)]]</div> | ||
{{CompareVersions|SB|1.18.50|SB 1965|SB 1972-77}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | {{RandomImage}} | ||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
==== TEXT No. 50 ==== | ==== TEXT No. 50 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="SB65verse"> | ||
Prayasah sadhavo loke parair dwandvesu yojitah | |||
Na bythanti na hrishyanti yata atma agunashrayah. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
==== ENGLISH SYNONYMS ==== | ==== ENGLISH SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
Praysah—generally, Sadhavo—saints, loke—in this world, Parair—by others, Dwandwesu—in the matter of duality, Yojitah—being engaged, Na—never, Bythauti—distressed, Na—neither, Hrish yanti—takes pleasure, Yata—because, Atma—self, Agunashrayah—transcendental. | Praysah—generally, Sadhavo—saints, loke—in this world, Parair—by others, Dwandwesu—in the matter of duality, Yojitah—being engaged, Na—never, Bythauti—distressed, Na—neither, Hrish yanti—takes pleasure, Yata—because, Atma—self, Agunashrayah—transcendental. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
Generally the transcendentalists even though they are engaged by others in the duality of the material world, neither they are distressed nor they take pleasures in them on account of transcendentally engaged. | Generally the transcendentalists even though they are engaged by others in the duality of the material world, neither they are distressed nor they take pleasures in them on account of transcendentally engaged. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
The transcendentalists are the empiric philosophers, mystics and the devotees of the Lord. Empiric philosophers aims at the perfection of merging into the being of Absolute, the mystics aims at perceiving the all pervading Super Soul and the devotees of the Lord are engaged in the transcendental loving service of the Personality of Godhead. As Brahman, Paramatam or Bhagawan are different phases of the same transcendence all the above mentioned transcendentalist are beyond the three modes of material nature. Material distresses and happinesses are products of the three modes and therefore the causes of such material distress and happiness have nothing to do with the transcendentalists. Both the sage and the king were transcendentalists. The king was a devotee and the Risi was a mystic. Therefore both of them were unattached to the accidental incidence created by the Supreme will. The playful child was an instrument in fulfilling the Lords will. | The transcendentalists are the empiric philosophers, mystics and the devotees of the Lord. Empiric philosophers aims at the perfection of merging into the being of Absolute, the mystics aims at perceiving the all pervading Super Soul and the devotees of the Lord are engaged in the transcendental loving service of the Personality of Godhead. As Brahman, Paramatam or Bhagawan are different phases of the same transcendence all the above mentioned transcendentalist are beyond the three modes of material nature. Material distresses and happinesses are products of the three modes and therefore the causes of such material distress and happiness have nothing to do with the transcendentalists. Both the sage and the king were transcendentalists. The king was a devotee and the Risi was a mystic. Therefore both of them were unattached to the accidental incidence created by the Supreme will. The playful child was an instrument in fulfilling the Lords will. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 39: | Line 41: | ||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.18.49 (1965)]] '''[[SB 1.18.49 (1965)]] - [[SB 1.19.1 (1965)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.19.1 (1965)]]</div> | <div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.18.49 (1965)]] '''[[SB 1.18.49 (1965)]] - [[SB 1.19.1 (1965)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.19.1 (1965)]]</div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Latest revision as of 10:26, 25 May 2020
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT No. 50
Prayasah sadhavo loke parair dwandvesu yojitah Na bythanti na hrishyanti yata atma agunashrayah.
ENGLISH SYNONYMS
Praysah—generally, Sadhavo—saints, loke—in this world, Parair—by others, Dwandwesu—in the matter of duality, Yojitah—being engaged, Na—never, Bythauti—distressed, Na—neither, Hrish yanti—takes pleasure, Yata—because, Atma—self, Agunashrayah—transcendental.
TRANSLATION
Generally the transcendentalists even though they are engaged by others in the duality of the material world, neither they are distressed nor they take pleasures in them on account of transcendentally engaged.
PURPORT
The transcendentalists are the empiric philosophers, mystics and the devotees of the Lord. Empiric philosophers aims at the perfection of merging into the being of Absolute, the mystics aims at perceiving the all pervading Super Soul and the devotees of the Lord are engaged in the transcendental loving service of the Personality of Godhead. As Brahman, Paramatam or Bhagawan are different phases of the same transcendence all the above mentioned transcendentalist are beyond the three modes of material nature. Material distresses and happinesses are products of the three modes and therefore the causes of such material distress and happiness have nothing to do with the transcendentalists. Both the sage and the king were transcendentalists. The king was a devotee and the Risi was a mystic. Therefore both of them were unattached to the accidental incidence created by the Supreme will. The playful child was an instrument in fulfilling the Lords will.
Thus end the Bhaktivedanta Purports of the first Canto Eighteenth Chapter in the matter of Maharaj Parikshit Cursed By A Brahmin Boy.