Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


CC Madhya 7.29 (1975): Difference between revisions

(Vanibot #0027: CCMirror - Mirror CC's 1996 edition to form a basis for 1975)
 
(Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Madhya (1975)|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 7 (1975)|Chapter 7: The Lord Begins His Tour of South India]]'''</div>
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Madhya (1975)|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 7 (1975)|Chapter 7: The Lord Begins His Tour of South India]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 7.28 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 7.28]] '''[[CC Madhya 7.28 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 7.28]] - [[CC Madhya 7.30 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 7.30]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 7.30 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 7.30]]</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 7.28 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 7.28]] '''[[CC Madhya 7.28 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 7.28]] - [[CC Madhya 7.30 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 7.30]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 7.30 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 7.30]]</div>
{{CompareVersions|CC|Madhya 7.29|CC 1975|CC 1996}}
{{RandomImage}}
{{RandomImage}}


''Below is the 1996 edition text, ready to be substituted with the 1975 one using the compile form.''


==== TEXT 29 ====
==== TEXT 29 ====
Line 32: Line 31:


<div class="purport">
<div class="purport">
All the accusations made by Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu against His beloved devotees actually showed His great appreciation of their intense love for Him. Yet He mentioned these faults one after another as if He were offended by their intense affection. The personal associates of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu sometimes behaved contrary to regulative principles out of intense love for the Lord, and because of their love Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu Himself sometimes violated the regulative principles of a sannyāsī. In the eyes of the public, such violations are not good, but Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu was so controlled by His devotees’ love that He was obliged to break some of the rules. Although accusing them, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu was indirectly indicating that He was very satisfied with their behavior in pure love of Godhead. Therefore in verse 27 He mentions that His devotees and associates place more importance on love of Kṛṣṇa than on social etiquette. There are many instances of devotional service rendered by previous ācāryas who did not care about social behavior when intensely absorbed in love for Kṛṣṇa. Unfortunately, as long as we are within this material world, we must observe social customs to avoid criticism by the general populace. This is Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu’s desire.
All the accusations made by Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu against His beloved devotees actually showed His great appreciation of their intense love for Him. Yet He mentioned these faults one after another as if He were offended by their intense affection. The personal associates of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu sometimes behaved contrary to regulative principles out of intense love for the Lord, and because of their love Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu Himself sometimes violated the regulative principles of a sannyāsī. In the eyes of the public, such violations are not good, but Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu was so controlled by His devotees' love that He was obliged to break some of the rules. Although accusing them, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu was indirectly indicating that He was very satisfied with their behavior in pure love of Godhead. Therefore in verse 27 He mentions that His devotees and associates place more importance on love of Kṛṣṇa than on social etiquette. There are many instances of devotional service rendered by previous ācāryas who did not care about social behavior when intensely absorbed in love for Kṛṣṇa. Unfortunately, as long as we are within this material world, we must observe social customs to avoid criticism by the general populace. This is Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu's desire.
</div>
</div>



Latest revision as of 19:25, 27 January 2020



His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



TEXT 29

iṅhā-sabāra vaśa prabhu haye ye ye guṇe
doṣāropa-cchale kare guṇa āsvādane


SYNONYMS

iṅhā-sabāra—of all the devotees; vaśa—controlled; prabhu—the Lord; haye—is; ye ye—whatever; guṇe—by the qualities; doṣa-āropa-chale—on the plea of attributing faults; kare—does; guṇa—high qualities; āsvādane—tasting.


TRANSLATION

Actually the Lord was controlled by the good qualities of all His devotees. On the pretense of attributing faults, He tasted all these qualities.


PURPORT

All the accusations made by Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu against His beloved devotees actually showed His great appreciation of their intense love for Him. Yet He mentioned these faults one after another as if He were offended by their intense affection. The personal associates of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu sometimes behaved contrary to regulative principles out of intense love for the Lord, and because of their love Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu Himself sometimes violated the regulative principles of a sannyāsī. In the eyes of the public, such violations are not good, but Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu was so controlled by His devotees' love that He was obliged to break some of the rules. Although accusing them, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu was indirectly indicating that He was very satisfied with their behavior in pure love of Godhead. Therefore in verse 27 He mentions that His devotees and associates place more importance on love of Kṛṣṇa than on social etiquette. There are many instances of devotional service rendered by previous ācāryas who did not care about social behavior when intensely absorbed in love for Kṛṣṇa. Unfortunately, as long as we are within this material world, we must observe social customs to avoid criticism by the general populace. This is Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu's desire.