SB 1.18.29 (1965): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "<div style="float:left">link=SB (1965) Eighteenth Chapter - Maharaj Parikshit Cursed By A Brahmin Boy '''[[SB (1965) Eighteenth Chapter - Maharaj Pari...") |
(Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam (1962-1965) - Canto 01 Chapter 18]] | |||
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB (1965) Eighteenth Chapter - Maharaj Parikshit Cursed By A Brahmin Boy]] '''[[SB (1965) Eighteenth Chapter - Maharaj Parikshit Cursed By A Brahmin Boy]]'''</div> | <div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB (1965) Eighteenth Chapter - Maharaj Parikshit Cursed By A Brahmin Boy]] '''[[SB (1965) Eighteenth Chapter - Maharaj Parikshit Cursed By A Brahmin Boy]]'''</div> | ||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.18.28 (1965)]] '''[[SB 1.18.28 (1965)]] - [[SB 1.18.30 (1965)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.18.30 (1965)]]</div> | <div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.18.28 (1965)]] '''[[SB 1.18.28 (1965)]] - [[SB 1.18.30 (1965)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.18.30 (1965)]]</div> | ||
{{CompareVersions|SB|1.18.29|SB 1965|SB 1972-77}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | {{RandomImage}} | ||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
==== TEXT No. 29 ==== | ==== TEXT No. 29 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="SB65verse"> | ||
Abhutapurbah sahsa kshut tridbhyam ardita atmanah | |||
Brahmanam prati abhut brahman matsaro manyur eva cha. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
==== ENGLISH SYNONYMS ==== | ==== ENGLISH SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
Abhutapurva—unprecedental, Sahasa—circumstantially, Kshut—hunger, Tridbhyam—as well as by thirst, Ardita—being distressed, Atmanah—of his self, Brahmanam—unto a Brahmin, Prati—counter, Abhut—became, Brahman—oh the Brahmins, Matsaro—envious, Manyur—angry, Eva—thus, Cha—and. | Abhutapurva—unprecedental, Sahasa—circumstantially, Kshut—hunger, Tridbhyam—as well as by thirst, Ardita—being distressed, Atmanah—of his self, Brahmanam—unto a Brahmin, Prati—counter, Abhut—became, Brahman—oh the Brahmins, Matsaro—envious, Manyur—angry, Eva—thus, Cha—and. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
Oh the Brahmins, thus unprecedently the King became counter angry and envious upon a Brahmin (the sage) circumstantially being pressed by too much hunger and thirst. | Oh the Brahmins, thus unprecedently the King became counter angry and envious upon a Brahmin (the sage) circumstantially being pressed by too much hunger and thirst. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
To become angry and envious by king like Maharaj Parikshit especially upon a sage and Brahmin was undoubtedly unprecedential. The king knew it well that the Brahmins and the sages like children, women and old men are always beyond the jurisdiction of punishment of the king. Similarly the king even though he may commit a great mistake he is never to be considered as wrong doer. But in this case Maharaj Parikshit became unprecedently as angry and envious upon the sage due to his so called thirst and hunger by the will of the Lord. The king was right to punish his subject for coldly receiving him or neglecting him but because the culprit was a Sage and Brahmin it was unprecedential for him. As the Lord is never envious to anyone so also the Lord's devotee is never envious upon anyone. The only justification for Maharaj Parikshit's becoming angry and envious upon the sage is therefore explained as ordained by the Lord. | To become angry and envious by king like Maharaj Parikshit especially upon a sage and Brahmin was undoubtedly unprecedential. The king knew it well that the Brahmins and the sages like children, women and old men are always beyond the jurisdiction of punishment of the king. Similarly the king even though he may commit a great mistake he is never to be considered as wrong doer. But in this case Maharaj Parikshit became unprecedently as angry and envious upon the sage due to his so called thirst and hunger by the will of the Lord. The king was right to punish his subject for coldly receiving him or neglecting him but because the culprit was a Sage and Brahmin it was unprecedential for him. As the Lord is never envious to anyone so also the Lord's devotee is never envious upon anyone. The only justification for Maharaj Parikshit's becoming angry and envious upon the sage is therefore explained as ordained by the Lord. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 36: | Line 38: | ||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.18.28 (1965)]] '''[[SB 1.18.28 (1965)]] - [[SB 1.18.30 (1965)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.18.30 (1965)]]</div> | <div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.18.28 (1965)]] '''[[SB 1.18.28 (1965)]] - [[SB 1.18.30 (1965)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.18.30 (1965)]]</div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Latest revision as of 10:18, 25 May 2020
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT No. 29
Abhutapurbah sahsa kshut tridbhyam ardita atmanah Brahmanam prati abhut brahman matsaro manyur eva cha.
ENGLISH SYNONYMS
Abhutapurva—unprecedental, Sahasa—circumstantially, Kshut—hunger, Tridbhyam—as well as by thirst, Ardita—being distressed, Atmanah—of his self, Brahmanam—unto a Brahmin, Prati—counter, Abhut—became, Brahman—oh the Brahmins, Matsaro—envious, Manyur—angry, Eva—thus, Cha—and.
TRANSLATION
Oh the Brahmins, thus unprecedently the King became counter angry and envious upon a Brahmin (the sage) circumstantially being pressed by too much hunger and thirst.
PURPORT
To become angry and envious by king like Maharaj Parikshit especially upon a sage and Brahmin was undoubtedly unprecedential. The king knew it well that the Brahmins and the sages like children, women and old men are always beyond the jurisdiction of punishment of the king. Similarly the king even though he may commit a great mistake he is never to be considered as wrong doer. But in this case Maharaj Parikshit became unprecedently as angry and envious upon the sage due to his so called thirst and hunger by the will of the Lord. The king was right to punish his subject for coldly receiving him or neglecting him but because the culprit was a Sage and Brahmin it was unprecedential for him. As the Lord is never envious to anyone so also the Lord's devotee is never envious upon anyone. The only justification for Maharaj Parikshit's becoming angry and envious upon the sage is therefore explained as ordained by the Lord.