SB 1.4.12: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
(Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{info | {{info | ||
|speaker= | |speaker=Śaunaka Ṛṣi | ||
|listener= | |listener=Sūta Gosvāmī and the Sages | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam - Canto 01 Chapter 04]] | |||
[[Category:Bhagavatam Verses Spoken by Saunaka Rsi - Vanisource|010412]] | |||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Srimad-Bhagavatam]] - [[SB 1|First Canto]] - [[SB 1.4: The Appearance of Sri Narada|Chapter 4: The Appearance of Śrī Nārada]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.4.11]] '''[[SB 1.4.11]] - [[SB 1.4.13]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.4.13]]</div> | |||
{{CompareVersions|SB|1.4.12|SB 1962|SB 1972-77}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 12 ==== | ==== TEXT 12 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
śivāya lokasya bhavāya bhūtaye | :śivāya lokasya bhavāya bhūtaye | ||
ya uttama-śloka-parāyaṇā janāḥ | :ya uttama-śloka-parāyaṇā janāḥ | ||
jīvanti nātmārtham asau parāśrayaṁ | :jīvanti nātmārtham asau parāśrayaṁ | ||
mumoca nirvidya kutaḥ kalevaram | :mumoca nirvidya kutaḥ kalevaram | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 23: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
''śivāya''—welfare; ''lokasya''—of all living beings; ''bhavāya''—for flourishing; ''bhūtaye''—for economic development; ''ye''—one who is; ''uttama-śloka-parāyaṇāḥ''—devoted to the cause of the Personality of Godhead; ''janāḥ''—men; ''jīvanti''—do live; ''na''—but not; ''ātma-artham''—selfish interest; ''asau''—that; ''para-āśrayam''—shelter for others; ''mumoca''—gave up; ''nirvidya''—being freed from all attachment; ''kutaḥ''—for what reason; ''kalevaram''—mortal body. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 24: | Line 30: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
Those who are devoted to the cause of the Personality of Godhead live only for the welfare, development and happiness of others. They do not live for any selfish interest. So even though the Emperor [Parīkṣit] was free from all attachment to worldly possessions, how could he give up his mortal body, which was shelter for others? | Those who are devoted to the cause of the Personality of Godhead live only for the welfare, development and happiness of others. They do not live for any selfish interest. So even though the Emperor [Parīkṣit] was free from all attachment to worldly possessions, how could he give up his mortal body, which was shelter for others? | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 37: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
Parīkṣit Mahārāja was an ideal king and householder because he was a devotee of the Personality of Godhead. A devotee of the Lord automatically has all good qualifications. And the Emperor was a typical example of this. Personally he had no attachment for all the worldly opulences in his possession. But since he was king for the all-around welfare of his citizens, he was always busy in the welfare work of the public, not only for this life, but also for the next. He would not allow slaughterhouses or killing of cows. He was not a foolish and partial administrator who would arrange for the protection of one living being and allow another to be killed. Because he was a devotee of the Lord, he knew perfectly well how to conduct his administration for everyone's happiness—men, animals, plants and all living creatures. He was not selfishly interested. Selfishness is either self-centered or self-extended. He was neither. His interest was to please the Supreme Truth, Personality of Godhead. The king is the representative of the Supreme Lord, and therefore the king's interest must be identical with that of the Supreme Lord. The Supreme Lord wants all living beings to be obedient to Him and thereby become happy. Therefore the king's interest is to guide all subjects back to the kingdom of God. Hence the activities of the citizens should be so coordinated that they can at the end go back home, back to Godhead. Under the administration of a representative king, the kingdom is full of opulence. At that time, human beings need not eat animals. There are ample food grains, milk, fruit and vegetables so that the human beings as well as the animals can eat sumptuously and to their heart's content. If all living beings are satisfied with food and shelter and obey the prescribed rules, there cannot be any disturbance between one living being and another. Emperor Parīkṣit was a worthy king, and therefore all were happy during his reign. | Parīkṣit Mahārāja was an ideal king and householder because he was a devotee of the Personality of Godhead. A devotee of the Lord automatically has all good qualifications. And the Emperor was a typical example of this. Personally he had no attachment for all the worldly opulences in his possession. But since he was king for the all-around welfare of his citizens, he was always busy in the welfare work of the public, not only for this life, but also for the next. He would not allow slaughterhouses or killing of cows. He was not a foolish and partial administrator who would arrange for the protection of one living being and allow another to be killed. Because he was a devotee of the Lord, he knew perfectly well how to conduct his administration for everyone's happiness—men, animals, plants and all living creatures. He was not selfishly interested. Selfishness is either self-centered or self-extended. He was neither. His interest was to please the Supreme Truth, Personality of Godhead. The king is the representative of the Supreme Lord, and therefore the king's interest must be identical with that of the Supreme Lord. The Supreme Lord wants all living beings to be obedient to Him and thereby become happy. Therefore the king's interest is to guide all subjects back to the kingdom of God. Hence the activities of the citizens should be so coordinated that they can at the end go back home, back to Godhead. Under the administration of a representative king, the kingdom is full of opulence. At that time, human beings need not eat animals. There are ample food grains, milk, fruit and vegetables so that the human beings as well as the animals can eat sumptuously and to their heart's content. If all living beings are satisfied with food and shelter and obey the prescribed rules, there cannot be any disturbance between one living being and another. Emperor Parīkṣit was a worthy king, and therefore all were happy during his reign. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.4.11]] '''[[SB 1.4.11]] - [[SB 1.4.13]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.4.13]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Revision as of 11:07, 25 May 2020
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 12
- śivāya lokasya bhavāya bhūtaye
- ya uttama-śloka-parāyaṇā janāḥ
- jīvanti nātmārtham asau parāśrayaṁ
- mumoca nirvidya kutaḥ kalevaram
SYNONYMS
śivāya—welfare; lokasya—of all living beings; bhavāya—for flourishing; bhūtaye—for economic development; ye—one who is; uttama-śloka-parāyaṇāḥ—devoted to the cause of the Personality of Godhead; janāḥ—men; jīvanti—do live; na—but not; ātma-artham—selfish interest; asau—that; para-āśrayam—shelter for others; mumoca—gave up; nirvidya—being freed from all attachment; kutaḥ—for what reason; kalevaram—mortal body.
TRANSLATION
Those who are devoted to the cause of the Personality of Godhead live only for the welfare, development and happiness of others. They do not live for any selfish interest. So even though the Emperor [Parīkṣit] was free from all attachment to worldly possessions, how could he give up his mortal body, which was shelter for others?
PURPORT
Parīkṣit Mahārāja was an ideal king and householder because he was a devotee of the Personality of Godhead. A devotee of the Lord automatically has all good qualifications. And the Emperor was a typical example of this. Personally he had no attachment for all the worldly opulences in his possession. But since he was king for the all-around welfare of his citizens, he was always busy in the welfare work of the public, not only for this life, but also for the next. He would not allow slaughterhouses or killing of cows. He was not a foolish and partial administrator who would arrange for the protection of one living being and allow another to be killed. Because he was a devotee of the Lord, he knew perfectly well how to conduct his administration for everyone's happiness—men, animals, plants and all living creatures. He was not selfishly interested. Selfishness is either self-centered or self-extended. He was neither. His interest was to please the Supreme Truth, Personality of Godhead. The king is the representative of the Supreme Lord, and therefore the king's interest must be identical with that of the Supreme Lord. The Supreme Lord wants all living beings to be obedient to Him and thereby become happy. Therefore the king's interest is to guide all subjects back to the kingdom of God. Hence the activities of the citizens should be so coordinated that they can at the end go back home, back to Godhead. Under the administration of a representative king, the kingdom is full of opulence. At that time, human beings need not eat animals. There are ample food grains, milk, fruit and vegetables so that the human beings as well as the animals can eat sumptuously and to their heart's content. If all living beings are satisfied with food and shelter and obey the prescribed rules, there cannot be any disturbance between one living being and another. Emperor Parīkṣit was a worthy king, and therefore all were happy during his reign.