SB 1.7.35 (1964): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "<div style="float:left">link=SB 1964 Seventh Chapter - The Son of Drona Punished (continued) '''[[SB 1964 Seventh Chapter - The Son of Drona Punished ...") |
(Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1964 Seventh Chapter - The Son of Drona Punished (continued)]] '''[[SB 1964 Seventh Chapter - The Son of Drona Punished (continued)|SB (1964) Seventh Chapter | [[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam (1962-1965) - Canto 01 Chapter 07]] | ||
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB (1964) Seventh Chapter - The Son of Drona Punished (continued)]] '''[[SB (1964) Seventh Chapter - The Son of Drona Punished (continued)|SB (1964) Seventh Chapter - The Son of Drona Punished]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.7.34 (1964)]] '''[[SB 1.7.34 (1964)]] - [[SB 1.7.36 (1964)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.7.36 (1964)]]</div> | <div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.7.34 (1964)]] '''[[SB 1.7.34 (1964)]] - [[SB 1.7.36 (1964)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.7.36 (1964)]]</div> | ||
{{CompareVersions|SB|1.7.35|SB 1964|SB 1972-77}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | {{RandomImage}} | ||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
==== TEXT No. 35 ==== | ==== TEXT No. 35 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="SB65verse"> | ||
Mainam partha arhasi tratum brahmabandhum imam jahi | |||
Ja asou anagasah suptan abadhit nishi valakan. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
==== ENGLISH SYNONYMS ==== | ==== ENGLISH SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
Mainam-never unto him, Partha-oh Arjuna, Arhasi-ought to, Tratum-give release, Brahmabandhum-a relative of a Brahmin, Imam-him, Jahi-kill, Ja-he (who has) Asou-those, Anagasha-faultless, Suptan-while sleeping, Avadhit-got killed, Nishi-at night, valakan-the boys. | Mainam-never unto him, Partha-oh Arjuna, Arhasi-ought to, Tratum-give release, Brahmabandhum-a relative of a Brahmin, Imam-him, Jahi-kill, Ja-he (who has) Asou-those, Anagasha-faultless, Suptan-while sleeping, Avadhit-got killed, Nishi-at night, valakan-the boys. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
Lord Sri Krishna said, "Oh Arjuna you ought not to show any mercy for his releasing this relative of a Brahmin who has killed innocent and sleeping boys without any fault." | Lord Sri Krishna said, "Oh Arjuna you ought not to show any mercy for his releasing this relative of a Brahmin who has killed innocent and sleeping boys without any fault." | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
The Brahmabandhu is significant. A person who happens to take birth in the family of a Brahman but is not qualified enough to be called a Brahmin is addressed as the relative of a Brahmin and not as a Brahmin. The son of a High court judge is not virtually a high court judge but there is no harm to address a high court judge's son, as a relative of the Hon. Justice. Therefore, as by birth only one does not become a high court judge, so also one does not become a brahmin simply by birth right but by acquiring the necessary qualifications of a Brahmin. As the high court judgeship is a post for the qualified man so also the post of a Brahmin is attainable by qualification only. The Shastra enjoins that even if such good qualifications are seen in a person born in the family of other than a Brahmin, the qualified man has to be accepted as a Brahmin and similarly if a person born in the family of a Brahmin, is void of Brahminical qualification, must be treated as a non-brahmin or in better terms a relative of a Brahmin! Lord Sri Krishna the Supreme Authority of all religious principles of the Vedas, has personally pointed out this differences and he is about to explain the reason for this in the following slokas. | The Brahmabandhu is significant. A person who happens to take birth in the family of a Brahman but is not qualified enough to be called a Brahmin is addressed as the relative of a Brahmin and not as a Brahmin. The son of a High court judge is not virtually a high court judge but there is no harm to address a high court judge's son, as a relative of the Hon. Justice. Therefore, as by birth only one does not become a high court judge, so also one does not become a brahmin simply by birth right but by acquiring the necessary qualifications of a Brahmin. As the high court judgeship is a post for the qualified man so also the post of a Brahmin is attainable by qualification only. The Shastra enjoins that even if such good qualifications are seen in a person born in the family of other than a Brahmin, the qualified man has to be accepted as a Brahmin and similarly if a person born in the family of a Brahmin, is void of Brahminical qualification, must be treated as a non-brahmin or in better terms a relative of a Brahmin! Lord Sri Krishna the Supreme Authority of all religious principles of the Vedas, has personally pointed out this differences and he is about to explain the reason for this in the following slokas. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 36: | Line 38: | ||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.7.34 (1964)]] '''[[SB 1.7.34 (1964)]] - [[SB 1.7.36 (1964)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.7.36 (1964)]]</div> | <div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.7.34 (1964)]] '''[[SB 1.7.34 (1964)]] - [[SB 1.7.36 (1964)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.7.36 (1964)]]</div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Latest revision as of 11:51, 25 May 2020
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT No. 35
Mainam partha arhasi tratum brahmabandhum imam jahi Ja asou anagasah suptan abadhit nishi valakan.
ENGLISH SYNONYMS
Mainam-never unto him, Partha-oh Arjuna, Arhasi-ought to, Tratum-give release, Brahmabandhum-a relative of a Brahmin, Imam-him, Jahi-kill, Ja-he (who has) Asou-those, Anagasha-faultless, Suptan-while sleeping, Avadhit-got killed, Nishi-at night, valakan-the boys.
TRANSLATION
Lord Sri Krishna said, "Oh Arjuna you ought not to show any mercy for his releasing this relative of a Brahmin who has killed innocent and sleeping boys without any fault."
PURPORT
The Brahmabandhu is significant. A person who happens to take birth in the family of a Brahman but is not qualified enough to be called a Brahmin is addressed as the relative of a Brahmin and not as a Brahmin. The son of a High court judge is not virtually a high court judge but there is no harm to address a high court judge's son, as a relative of the Hon. Justice. Therefore, as by birth only one does not become a high court judge, so also one does not become a brahmin simply by birth right but by acquiring the necessary qualifications of a Brahmin. As the high court judgeship is a post for the qualified man so also the post of a Brahmin is attainable by qualification only. The Shastra enjoins that even if such good qualifications are seen in a person born in the family of other than a Brahmin, the qualified man has to be accepted as a Brahmin and similarly if a person born in the family of a Brahmin, is void of Brahminical qualification, must be treated as a non-brahmin or in better terms a relative of a Brahmin! Lord Sri Krishna the Supreme Authority of all religious principles of the Vedas, has personally pointed out this differences and he is about to explain the reason for this in the following slokas.